[cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] dtaction: Fix unsafe use of sprintf

2012-08-08 Thread Robert Tomsick
I believe this fixes vulnerability #3 from CERT CA-1999-11.[1] The other uses of sprintf in DtAction seem to be safe. -Rob [1] https://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1999-11.html Signed-off-by: Robert Tomsick --- cde/programs/dtaction/Main.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

[cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] dtterm - minor warning fixes

2012-08-08 Thread Robert Tomsick
As the subject line says, two minor fixes to dtterm. -Rob From 1802d0fb59d438d5ca97507fd1cd51606b161da8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Tomsick Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:49:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] dtterm: logger - use socklen_t for addrlen in serve(char, int, int) Signed-off-by

[cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH 1/2] dthelpview: Main.c - Cleanup variable init

2012-08-08 Thread Robert Tomsick
Signed-off-by: Robert Tomsick --- cde/programs/dthelp/dthelpview/Main.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cde/programs/dthelp/dthelpview/Main.c b/cde/programs/dthelp/dthelpview/Main.c index d61c12a..c82e2ad 100644 --- a/cde/programs/dthelp/dthelpview/Main.c

[cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dthelpview: Util.c include stdlib to avoid redeclaring exit()

2012-08-08 Thread Robert Tomsick
Signed-off-by: Robert Tomsick --- cde/programs/dthelp/dthelpview/Util.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/cde/programs/dthelp/dthelpview/Util.c b/cde/programs/dthelp/dthelpview/Util.c index 9a89f94..d7e2813 100644 --- a/cde/programs/dthelp/dthelpview/Util.c +++ b/cde

[cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dtscreen: include stdlib where appropriate

2012-08-08 Thread Robert Tomsick
Signed-off-by: Robert Tomsick --- cde/programs/dtscreen/flame.c|1 + cde/programs/dtscreen/hopalong.c |1 + cde/programs/dtscreen/image.c|1 + cde/programs/dtscreen/life.c |1 + cde/programs/dtscreen/pyro.c |2 ++ cde/programs/dtscreen/qix.c |1

[cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH 1/2] dtscreen: include stdlib to avoid exit redeclaration

2012-08-08 Thread Robert Tomsick
Signed-off-by: Robert Tomsick --- cde/programs/dtscreen/dtscreen.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/cde/programs/dtscreen/dtscreen.c b/cde/programs/dtscreen/dtscreen.c index 5f8c4a1..6c22786 100644 --- a/cde/programs/dtscreen/dtscreen.c +++ b/cde/programs/dtscreen

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] OS X port

2012-08-09 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Jon Trulson wrote: > On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Alex Kornilov wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Is anyone working on a OS X port? >> >> Maybe include it in http://mxcl.github.com/homebrew? >> > > Not that I know of... Is it even possible? ie: can OSX run X11/Motif? There certainly are X server

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] Patches to some of the config tools

2012-08-09 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, ch...@chriswareham.net wrote: > Hi folks, > > I enabled a bunch of warning flags in the Imake.tmpl file, including -Wall and > -Werror. This failed to bootstrap the build, since there were errors in the > config tools. Attached is a patch that makes imake and several of the u

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] NetBSD/DragonFlyBSD progress

2012-09-23 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Christopher Turkel wrote: >>> CDE might also benefit from a better website. >> >> Go ahead :) > I'd love to. I see that cdesktopenv.org has been registered by Peter > Howkin. You guys also have commondesktop.org and opencde.org too. -R ---

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] NetBSD/DragonFlyBSD progress

2012-09-23 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Jon Trulson wrote: > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Robert Tomsick wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Christopher Turkel wrote: >> >>>>> CDE might also benefit from a better website. >>>> >>>> Go ahead

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] [PATCH] Enabled anti-aliased fonts for applications that support them

2012-09-27 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Peter Howkins wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:20:16AM +, Anthony Perkins wrote: >> Some applications do not support anti-aliased fonts at all, and some >> crash if they do not have a bitmapped font specified. This commit >> enables anti-aliasing by default and includ

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] New default color scheme

2012-09-27 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, szt0...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello all! > > First of all, I'd like to thank all the people who were involved in > releasing CDE as open source. It was the first UNIX desktop environment I > used, I liked it very much, and now, I can use it on Linux. > > Now, has anybody though

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] Small dthelp-related fixes

2012-09-29 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Marc Balmer wrote: > Am 29.09.12 03:29, schrieb Jon Trulson: >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Marc Balmer wrote: >> >>> for patch 1: don't roll your own strfunctions, use strlcpy or so >> >> I'm inclined to apply this - strlcpy isn't available on all systems >> (on linux, requires b

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] Usability problems

2012-10-15 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Christian Klukas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:46 AM, miqlas wrote: > >> The more Skype instance was my fault. If you start Skype, it doenst >> check if there is any another running instance, and it will start a >> new one. You can found the old one on the system tray. B

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] Usability problems

2012-10-15 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Christopher Turkel wrote: > I am adamantly opposed to tray icon support in CDE. I realize I'll > probably we outvoted on this but I just don't think that should be CDE's > job, to manage tray icons. There are plenty of things that serve this > function: stalonetray is a g

[cdesktopenv-devel] BSD licensed contributions?

2012-11-27 Thread Robert Tomsick
I know that the project requests that contributions be made under the MIT license, but I was wondering whether 2-clause or 3-clause BSD would be an appropriate alternative. I read the section on licensing and why MIT is requested -- and from that it would seem that those BSD licenses would be f

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] BSD licensed contributions?

2012-11-27 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Isaac Dunham wrote: > FYI: 3-clause BSD is MIT + "Binary distributions must include this > copyright notice in accompanying documentation" (clause 2). 2-clause BSD > drops the restriction on implying the endorsement of the copyright > holder (clause 3), rather than the re

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] BSD licensed contributions?

2012-11-27 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Isaac Dunham wrote: > Out of curiousity (not trying to argue against including it), > 1. What's the benefit of using this tool? Something to bind to Alt-F2 that fits in with an otherwise-all-Motif desktop. :D Kinda like GNOME + KDE's runner, but not using GTK/Qt. > 2. Wh

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] BSD licensed contributions?

2012-11-27 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Christopher Turkel wrote: > Is this dtrun, that you created for OpenCDE? if so, bring it on. I miss > having a run dialog box. Yes. Only written slightly better (straight C for starters...) -Rob ---

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] BSD licensed contributions?

2012-11-27 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Jon Trulson wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Robert Tomsick wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Christopher Turkel wrote: >> >>> Is this dtrun, that you created for OpenCDE? if so, bring it on. I miss >>> having a run dialo

[cdesktopenv-devel] Dtrun

2012-11-28 Thread Robert Tomsick
Dtrun. It runs things. It's nice to bind to Alt-F2. It's plain X/Motif. It's under the MIT license. Tarball here: http://www.tomsick.net/projects/dtrun.html Also, I know I don't have fallback resources, etc. set up properly. My motivation to screw around with stuff like that kinda tails off

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] poll: build system for CDE

2013-02-05 Thread Robert Tomsick
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Oleksiy Ch wrote: > Hello guys, > > Let me raise one question: what is a best preferred build system you > consider for CDE and in general? I address this question to people > having experience with maintaining *nix software in general and writing > code in particular. > >

Re: [cdesktopenv-devel] dtlogin & sound

2014-02-24 Thread Robert Tomsick
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 09:41:11PM +0200, Antonis Tsolomitis wrote: > > > > > > You are probably correct. But this means that one would not use pulse at > > all. (Pulse is already in the audio group > > so using pulse does not need to add users to that group). What you > > suggest is a solutio