Hmm…if you have a writeup of what you did to build Motif and then CDE, I can
certainly take a shot at replicating it on my T5240, although it may be next
week before I can get much done; didn’t realize the scarcity of modern SPARC in
hands free to use it as they wished. :-) (I’ve way too many
On 20/11/2014 13:53, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> You’re quite right, I didn’t have that package installed. It quite surprises
> me that a full desktop install didn’t include even the motif lib and headers
> anymore. :-/
>
> Do we know whether a build of CDE should work with the vendor Motif li
You’re quite right, I didn’t have that package installed. It quite surprises
me that a full desktop install didn’t include even the motif lib and headers
anymore. :-/
Do we know whether a build of CDE should work with the vendor Motif libs?
And are either of those packages available for SPARC?
I have an IPS openmotif package available that installs to
"/opt/SMM/openmotif" and a IPS package of the current CDE snapshot that
uses that installed version of openmotif.
Did you have the Oracle version of "pkg:/library/motif" installed?
There are a lot of files in that package that conflict
During my testing I've noticed the following issue.
I may be doing something wrong so please let me know if I'm way off.
Most of this detail is from the following URL (and relevant links within)
http://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2012/XDC2012AbstractAlanCoopersmith/SolarisXorgPrivileges.pdf
Solar
On Nov 19, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Jon Trulson wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
[…]
>> My immediate interest is getting CDE on OS X and Solaris 11. AFAIK,
>> both of those either have automake/autoconf from the vendor, or
>> have it in a reasonably well-supported packaging of
This patch fixes build problems on FreeBSD 10.1.
Imake doesn't use the traditional mode of cpp any longer if cpp is
part of clang. The new clang-cpp ignores stringification (#) and
token pasting (##) under some conditions and therefore is no longer
compatible with CDE's build system.
The patch
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Copyleft vs permissive license arguments get in the way of making good
technical decisions IMO - except when the distinction is needed for
NON-ideological arguments.
+1
Backwards compatibility has a couple of points to commend it:
* not alie
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Steven Edwards wrote:
Hi Bruno,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro <
oitofe...@gnu.org> wrote:
I sent a message a few days ago to this very mailing list
expressing my desire of migrating CDE's build system to GNU
Autotools[0]. Unfortunately, CDE
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro wrote:
Hello Steven!
Em Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:54:43 -0800
Steven Edwards escreveu:
I couldn't find any information on if anyone else is working on
either of these but I've started hacking on it in my local tree and
am making pretty good progress
10 matches
Mail list logo
