Noel Chiappa wrote:
> https://walden-family.com/impcode/imp-code.pdf
> Someone's already done the specialist OCR to deal with faded program
> listings.
I tried to contact the author about converting some of the other IMP
listings, but got no reply.
Noel Chiappa wrote:
> I have been told that at one point Google was 'downgrading' results
> that used plain HTTP, instead of HTTPS, because they were trying to
> push people to switch to HTTPS (this was when everyone was
> hyperventilating over the Snowden revelations). Given the
> near-ubiquitous
Grant Taylor wrote:
> I find myself interested in (at least) the following and would like to
> find others with similar (dis)interests to chat about things.
>
> - 10Base5 / 10Base2 / 10BaseT
> - ISDN
> - DSL / ADSL / SDSL / HDSL
> - T1 / E1
> - ATM
> - Frame Relay
> - ARCnet
> - PSTN / PBX
Warner Losh wrote:
> NCP was the forerunner of TCP/IP. Net Unix had it as its supported
> protocol and that was old enough that BSD had at least one
> implementation.
Are you saying there's a BSD Unix with Arpanet NCP? If so, where?
Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> If we're going to do Tymnet, we should definitely do Telenet.
Telenet is BBN's commercial network based on their IMP technology,
right? How would you go about making a Telenet network?
Grant Taylor wrote:
> I think of Tymnet as a service and not as much as a protocol. Though
> maybe it implies a protocol and I'm unaware of it.
Tymshare was a service, but the computers talked to each over over a
vast network. The network was spun off as a separate business. There
is code avail
Grant Taylor wrote:
> My understanding is that 4.3BSD that ran on VAXes had support for NCP.
4.3BSD released in 1986 was long after ARPANET switched from NCP to
TCP/IP. Apparently early TCP/IP support was added to 4.1a in 1981.
I'm going out on a limb to claim BSD never had NCP support.
Lee Gleason wrote:
> I gave my VAXstation 100 system unit to Dave McGuire last year (I
> didn't need it since I lost interest in UNIBUS sized hobby equipment).
> Perhaps he could make a copy of its ROMs.
Thanks! I asked, and he said he's willing to dump the ROM.
Matt Burke wrote:
> I dumped the ROMs from my VAXstation 100 some time ago (along with many
> other DEC devices):
>
> http://www.9track.net/roms/
>
> 23-288E4.bin and 23-289E4.bin are probably the two main ones you are
> looking for. Do you just need the ROMs or are you looking for technical
> info
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>> My idea is to make a VS100 emulator and have it run the firmware
>> uploaded by early X versions.
>
> What kind of emulator are you planing? A completely new thing? Or do
> you want to use SIMH as a basis?
It's just a vague idea. It's much too early to say I have any k
Paul Koning wrote:
> When I did some looking it appeared to me that essentially all of
> what's online is simulators, not real machines.
That's right, but at least ITS is running on a real PDP-10 now.
Paul McJones posted this recently:
https://mcjones.org/CalTSS/
There aren't a lot of machine readable media, but many listings:
https://mcjones.org/CalTSS/source/
Chris Zach wrote:
> All that said, if I have to drive out to Seattle with a U-Haul I'll do
> it. Again. But I would prefer them to be displayed, taken care of,
> loved.
AI is available right now from here:
ssh i...@tty.livingcomputers.org
It's running under the name LC ITS now, but it's the ori
David Griffith wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how to created and load a "soft character
> set" into a vt220 terminal.
I have successfully done that with a real VT220. Here are some .txt
files with samples. They upload a custom font and arrange characters on
screen to display a picture. The E
Grant Taylor wrote:
>> https://github.com/larsbrinkhoff/sixel
> The naming of the git repository confused me a bit. I needed more
> coffee and time to realize that this is more about soft fonts (the
> thread subject) than it is about Sixel graphics.
It started with an idea about sixel graphics,
Grant Taylor wrote:
> I'm not that surprised that soft fonts are (re)using Sixel.
Maybe the other way around. I don't really know what the timeline was,
but it seems to me maybe soft fonts came first, with the VT220. The
VT240 had sixel graphics, right? But I'm guessing it came later. As
would
Hello,
I could use some help making sense of the VAXstation ROM images.
A set is provided here: https://www.9track.net/roms/
The two .bin files are each one halfword of a 16-bit wide ROM for the
68000 display processor. I checked it, and it's fine.
My problem is with the Bit Blit Accelator. Th
Paul Koning wrote:
> Given 16 bit wide ROMs, I would expect the microcode width to be
> rounded up to a multiple of that, so 64 bits, which means the expected
> ROM size is 64k bits. That matches two of the ROMs you mentioned.
I don't know if they are 16 bits wide. The two 68000 ROMs are 8 bit
w
Jake Utley wrote:
> Sellam Abraham
>> "A new PDP-10 has been put in the INTERNET."
>> "New" as in newly-built? Or "new" as in wasn't there before?
>> The hardware looks modern, and not at all like what a PDP-10 should look
>> like.
>
> I would say it is newly built as the pcb substrate looks noth
Mark Huffstutter via cctalk writes:
> Christian Corti wrote:
>> Interesting, but not really a beauty ;-) And BTW, who is SDF? They
>> don't tell it on their site.
> Short story on the welcome page.
Long story: https://archive.org/details/bbs-20030526-sdf
Paul Flo Williams wrote:
> During lockdown I was having some fun redrawing old DEC manual covers
> with Inkscape, specifically terminal and printer manuals from the late
> 1970s. I've attached a montage of four that I printed out so I could
> stick it on the wall. I'm aware I may be the only person
Tarek Hoteit wrote:
> I still don’t know who runs [SDF]
Stephen M. Jones.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SDF_Public_Access_Unix_System#History
https://archive.org/details/bbs-20030526-sdf
https://ia600903.us.archive.org/22/items/bsdtalk021/bsdtalk021.mp3
Hello,
Some Sun 1/4" tapes with NeWS has turned up in the SF Bay area.
However, the the tape drive available has bad rubber baby buggy bumpers.
Is there anyone around there who can provide new bumpers, or has a
working 1/4" tape drive and is willing to read the tapes?
Best regards,
Lars Brinkhoff
> Need to get rid of some things here that I am never going to use,
> maybe someone else will:
>
> M7705
> M7706
> M7906
> M7907
> M7908
I think I heard a VAXstation 100 owner missing an M7452. Any spares?
Fred Cisin wrote:
> So, what defines a "supercomputer"?
FLOPS
Steve Lewis wrote:
> I always considered a mainframe to basically be a "fully decked out"
> minicomputer.
You may find people will disagree with that. I'm not sure what
mainframe means either, but I'm asking around. Pysical size, I/O
capacity, CPU offload to front ends, and users served seem to
Paul Koning wrote:
> I noticed the section on deferred interrupts, which mentions Cutler
> and "fork" on RSX. It doesn't mention the similar mechanism, also
> called fork, in RT-11.
And, pray tell, what do these "fork" mean?
I'm curious since Unix has fork as a verb, whereas Tenex has it as a
no
Eric Moore wrote:
> Here is a hello world:
> (format t "Hello, World!")
> It kinda works, need to throw maybe a \n on it, no idea what options format
> takes.
Do it like this:
(format t "~&Hello, World!~%")
Looks like Common Lisp documentation works for the System 100 FORMAT:
http://www.lispwork
geneb wrote:
> Patrick Finnegan wrote:
>> It seems like all of the good USENET providers are subscription
>> services now.
> You can get free access via http://www.eternal-september.org/
There's also news.dotsrc.org. (formerly sunsite.dk)
Chuck Guzis wrote:
> That is a bit of a surprise--in my experience it takes very little
> code to support Forth on any processor--that someone would build a
> dedicated chip for it is unusual.
There are actually quite a few Forth processors. Charles Moore himself
designed half a dozen or so. The
Charles Dickman via cctalk writes:
>> He seems to have been the first to mention ARPANET in a popular
>> hobbyist-type context like BYTE. (Leading him to get kicked off
>> ARPANET!)
> Yes I remember reading something like that too. I would like to know
> the story of that.
You should probably ask
William Degnan wrote:
> This site can’t be reached
>
> www.pdp-8.org’s server DNS address could not be found.
> Search Google for pdp org postinfo
> ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED
The DNS names for the pdp8.org name servers fail to resolve. The name
server at 216.99.193.149 does respond to requests for pd
Jon Elson wrote:
> I'm not sure the original DEC PDP-10 (KA-10) used microcode, but the
> KI-10 did.
As far as I understand, the PDP-6 (type 166), KA10, and KI10 were
hardwired. KL10 and KS10 were microcoded. The Foonly F1 preceeded and
influenced the KL10 design.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
> Food and drink around the machines was also a definite no-no. Not just
> to prevent contamination (e.g. dumping your Coke into the keyboard of
> the operator's console)
Coke bottles caught near the DEC-10s MIT-MC and KATIA:
http://donhopkins.com/home/catalog/images/mc-consol
Kyle Owen wrote:
> Just a little bit of cursory looking turned up nothing. Has someone
> written a Forth interpreter for PDP-8? Preferably using 24-bit
> integers, but I'll take what I can get. OS/8 support would be nice.
I recently wrote a Forth cross compiler with PDP-8 support.
https://github.
Adam Thornton via cctalk writes:
> I have heard rumors of one "fredmacs" which is a more-or-less emacs that
> will run on PDP-11 v7 Unix.
I don't know if this is what you heard about, but Fred Fish wrote an
Emacs that ran on top of TECO-11.
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/academic/computer-science/hi
> I don't know if this is what you heard about, but Fred Fish wrote an
> Emacs that ran on top of TECO-11.
Another similar thing:
https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/academic/computer-science/history/pdp-11/decus/110737.html
Adam Thornton wrote:
> I finally got an Emacs running on v7--it's on misspiggy at LCML now as
> "ue". It's Microemacs 3.6
As far as I know, the first Emacs on a PDP-11 was written by MIT alumnus
Warren Montgomery at Bell labs.
https://github.com/larsbrinkhoff/emacs-history/blob/sources/docs/Mont
Paul Koning wrote:
> Even then it increments by 2, by special exception. So 112700, 1
> (movb #1,r0) fetches the instruction and increments PC by 2, then
> fetches the word where the PC points and increments by 2, not 1,
> again.
It's not really a special exception because immediate mode is @(R7)
Paul Koning wrote:
> Pascal is still around; the GCC compiler suite has it, and Modula-2 as
> well.
Speaking of which, GCC (or its first attempt) came from a Pascal
compiler called Pastel.
jos wrote:
>> I don't recall emulators for the early Datapoints.-
> There now is a Datapoint 2200 emulator
> Be aware that it does not show the true Datapoint fonts.
There is also an emulator for the 3300, with a font from an
imaged ROM. It's in here: https://github.com/aap/vt05/
(The 3300 is o
CAREY SCHUG wrote:
> What I wish somebody would create is an S-100 card (probably with a
> raspberry pie daughter running simulation for future upgradeability)
> that, initially emulates a complete Byte-8 or Imsai computer including
> memory and disk images on sdc cards, 24x40 display on an HDMI di
Paul Koning wrote:
> Suppose you had schematics of, say, a KA-10. You could turn those
> gates into VHDL or Verilog, and that should deliver an exact replica
> of the original machine, bug for bug compatible. That assumes the
> timing quirks are manageable
The mapping from asynchronous pulses, d
Phil Budne wrote:
> I wrote and tuned the code twenty years ago, but haven't looked at
> whether better results might be possible by wasting the capabilities
> of current systems (SIMD libaries and/or multiple cores). I felt like
> I only was able to give a slim impression, and I've also wondered
Mike Katz wrote:
> I want to add to this argument and ask Is bit 0 the high order bit
> (like on the PDP-8) or the low order bit (like on the 6809)?
It's the same across all PDPs... except maybe the 11, I'm sure someone
will remind me.
There are good arguments for numbering "bit N" such that its
Chuck Guzis wrote:
> I remember my friend, Debbie, who worked as a CE for DEC back in the
> primordial ages, made a big deal about the Super Foonly.
>
> Have any working Foonly systems survived?
The Stanford Super Foonly was designed, but never built. The project
ran out of ARPA funding in the ea
> Chuck Guzis wrote:
>> I remember my friend, Debbie, who worked as a CE for DEC back in the
>> primordial ages, made a big deal about the Super Foonly.
>>
>> Have any working Foonly systems survived?
>
> Software wise
Oh, and I forgot. There's a bunch of Foonly stuff from Tymshare/Tymnet.
Maybe
Paul Koning wrote:
> Does anyone know what that SC40 ("PDP-10 clone") can do? It seems to
> support SCSI I/O devices, interesting. What software, if any, might
> run on that?
It probably came from CompuServe, and it would have been running some
of CompuServe's software; user interface, database,
Paul Koning wrote:
>> It probably came from CompuServe, and it would have been running some
>> of CompuServe's software; user interface, database, I don't know.
> Yes, I believe the description says so. I was wondering if it could
> run any DEC software, in particular any DEC OS. Or other interes
Hello,
I have added a Unibus CH11 Chaosnet interface to SIMH. I have tested it
with 4.1BSD running on the vax780 simulator, and MINITS running on the
pdp11 simulator.
Adam Thornton wrote:
> So the first question is: where's the KCC configuration stored, so we
> can add the right library path [...] ?
If no one here knows, maybe someone on alt.sys.pdp10 does.
Paul Birkel wrote:
>>I wonder if, maybe, it used the same protocol as the GT40, which also
>>had a boot-over-serial line capability.
>
> Section 5.1.1 Bootstrap Loader describes the packed-and-serialized
> 6-bit "byte" stream
I have the GT40 boot ROM assembled on a PDP-10 host and used for booting
Angelo Papenhoff wrote:
> I'm wondering where the MIPS I-IV standards that are referenced
> everywhere are defined. I was able to actually find what seems to be the
> IV standard [1] but found no such thing for I-III.
Anything you find, I'd like to add to
https://github.com/larsbrinkhoff/awesome-c
Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> Data for VT100, VT220 and VT510 have been collected, as well as
> several emulators
> (https://github.com/mattiase/wraptest/blob/master/results.txt). If
> anyone has access to other working terminals, VT3xx/VT4xx in
> particular, I'd be most grateful if you would take a f
Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> Many thanks for the VT420 results!
I have a VT220 too, but it's in storage. I can dig it out if necessary,
but I'm hoping someone else can contribute those results.
Note that the setup probably can alter the results. I had "Auto Wrap"
enabled, which is probably what y
Warren Toomey wrote:
> are there any _good_ VT100 terminal emulators
This emulates the 8080 and runs off ROMs, if you want that kind of
accuracy:
https://github.com/phooky/VT100-Hax
Ethan Dicks wrote:
> Somewhere around 2004, I was setting up klh10. I found that xterm did
> not allow me to run emacs successfully.
I have successfullyl run xterm in VT52 mode with ITS Emacs.
Zane Healy wrote:
> I use RPi3’s for PDP-10 and DPS-8 emulation, I haven’t tried them for
> VAX emulation. I would like to try a RPi4 for VAX emulation.
I have an RPi4 running ITS. I attached a fast USB3 memory rather than
running off the SD card. For the full ITS rebuild from scratch it takes
Mark Kahrs wrote:
> The first implementation was done for the 7090 by McCarthy (hence CAR
> and CDR --- Contents of Address Register and Contents of Decrement
> Register).
Or was it an IBM 704?
Bill Degnan wrote:
> First full version 7090 and then a version was ported tot he PDP-1
> that was less powerful. This is straight from the LISP manual on
> site.
Which LISP manual is that?
The LISP I Programmer's Manual from 1960 says IBM 704. It also says "a
version of LISP I is being prepare
Hello,
A small group of volunteers are working on restoring JOSS-II, the PDP-6
version, to a working state. We are typing in a program listing
provided by the RAND corporation. The listing is the supervisor, which
is a large part of the system. So far good news.
The bad news is that it's not a
Chris Zach wrote:
> That's problematic. And now that I said I know COBOL81, I could find
> myself kidnapped by NJ Govt agents and chained to a VT05 terminal.
> No, no, not 12 lines per screen! HELP
Am I wrong in understanding the VT05 was 20 lines, and the VT50 12
lines?
By the way, I believe
Emanuel Stiebler wrote:
> was just fishing in old memories & graphics systems. We had in the
> 1980's a big fridge from Grinnell Systems as a frame buffer on a 11/34.
> Anybody remember those? Links to any documentation?
MIT Plama Fusion had one, made by John Kulp. It was connected to MIT-MC
and
This has some interesting information.
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a086098.pdf
Emanuel Stiebler
>> https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a086098.pdf
> GREAT FIND! I think it is the fridge I was talking/thinking about.
I think it's an early generation from Grinnell. Note the year ~1977.
The MIT one was from 1976, but maybe the same model GMR-27(0?).
The DTIC document de
emanuel stiebler writes:
>> I have made emulators for more obscure hardware than this.
> You've written an emulator for it?
No... not yet. But now it's on my to-do list.
Here are some notes I made about the MIT system:
https://github.com/PDP-10/its/issues/1837
Josh Dersch wrote:
> Anyone have any idea if any Imlac/Hazeltine Dynagraphic terminals are
> still around?
Maybe some of these people will know:
https://www.old-computers.com/museum/forum.asp?c=1295
Paul Koning wrote:
> Question to the list: is this something that would be of interest to
> others? If yes, I can make the design available. Perhaps the PCB
> layout and parts list.
Yes, I'm interested. I also have a broken LK201, and I have a Trinket
lying around.
Brad Parker wrote:
> Does anyone have, or know of low level documentation for Evans &
> Sutherland Picture System 2 hardware?
Sorry, I can't help. Is there any software for it?
I do consider making an emulator for the E&S LDS-1.
Sophie Haskins wrote:
> A long term dream of mine is to build some sort of general-purpose box
> that can make connections to arbitrary vintage computer
> keyboard/mouse/video ports, and connect in to modern HDMI & USB
> peripherals to make it easier to just pull a machine off the shelf and
> get g
Al Kossow wrote:
>> Algol W was from Eroupe?
> Algol W was from Stanford, written by Wirth when he was there
I wonder if there's any connection to Stanford's SAIL language?
Eric Smith wrote:
> When we restored the PDP-1 at CHM, we *really* wanted to make sure
> that the public could interact with it, though in a limited
> fashion. Ken Sumrall and I built quick-and-dirty Spacewar control
> boxes out of particle board and arcade switches, which were intended
> for resto
Mark Kahrs wrote:
> As a past occasional maintainer of SAIL, I'll add my version of history
Found in the source code:
There was a compiler named SAIL,
Assembled and coded in FAIL.
Its authors, they say
(one glorious day)
Were run out of town on a rail.
Jon Elson wrote:
> Yes, several other groups I read and contribute to have moved to
> groups.io, and they are working quite well and reliably. Some options
> require $10 a month to be free from ads.
That's a red flag.
Peter Coghlan wrote:
> Does anyone use ASCII anymore?
I read and write my email with Emacs running in a terminal emulator.
I rarely need anything beoynd codepoint 126.
I hear MIT-MC is a popular host for mailing lists. Remind me, is
ARPANET still up and running?
Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > Paul Koning wrote:
> > airfight and any number of other multi-user games -- a thing made
> > popular by PLATO and possibly originated there.
>
> What was the date on that? Multi-player MazeWar on the Imlacs/ITS at
> MIT was running before 1976 (I played it about then), but I
Paul Koning wrote:
>> I think Greg Thompson said he brought Maze to MIT in 1974. Wikipedia
>> says 1973. The game was first developed at NASA Ames in 1972.
> Ok, chances are that predates PLATO MUGs by 2-3 years.
Spasim from 1974 is usually regarded as contemporary with Maze.
I'm not so sure ab
> https://zork.net/~st/jottings/Real-VT102-emulation-with-MAME.html
Also.
https://github.com/phooky/VT100-Hax
https://www.pcjs.org/machines/dec/vt100/
Chuck Guzis wrote:
> Well, if one wanted to stay historically accurate, one would use a
> PDP-10.
It's not Crowther's Adventure, but the Infocom games.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
> Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
>> Chuck Guzis wrote:
>>> Well, if one wanted to stay historically accurate, one would use a
>>> PDP-10.
>> It's not Crowther's Adventure, but the Infocom games.
> Infocom's games were based on Crowther, after all.
Rich Alderson wrote:
> Well, they starte
How about running MDL Zork on ITS for historical accuracy? I'm scheming
with some of the implementers to take steps in that direction.
Eric Smith wrote:
> Infocom games were written in ZIL (based on MDL), and developed on a
> DECSYSTEM-20. Presumably Infocom had a ZIP for the -20, but they
> didn't publicly release that.
Maybe this.
https://github.com/PDP-10/its-vault/blob/master/twenex/zork/z/zip.mud.96
> When you've got that set up, post the link on Slashdot, they love text
> adventures.
I seen nothing there about the 1977 copy of Zork. If you're a Slashdot
regular, maybe post it there?
Richard Cini wrote:
> an article by Bob Meister that appeared in the July 1996 issue of
> Circuit Cellar with an LSI-11 simulator program.
I found this by Robert P. Meister at Battelle Columbus labs.
It mentions an LSI-II.
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a071102.pdf
Richard Cini wrote:
> I found this by Robert P. Meister at Battelle Columbus labs.
>
> The source code to the LSI11 says "R.W.Meister" so it's likely the
> same chap.
But P. isn't the same as W. :-(
Richard Cini wrote:
> Ha, yes, P != W. I have actually found several Bob Meisters, but it's
> like Where's Waldo.
People should have unique names to make it easier for us stalkers!
I have been trying to find Edward H. Black, ex MIT Dynamic Modeling.
Andrew Back wrote:
> Also wondered if SimH could be ported to a UEFI application. The
> environment seems to provide some O/S like features, but no idea how
> much would be missing or significantly different.
I made a set of stubs to compile and link a simulator without the SIMH
framework. Empty
Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> The first emulator is web based, and the second fails to build. I'm
> not a fan of web interfaces. Are there any other B5500 emulators
> and/or software that Bing missed?
Richard Cornwell added one to SIMH:
https://github.com/simh/simh/tree/master/B5500
>From the incompatible department of classic computement: A rather
complete full dump of the MIT-AI PDP-10 from 1971 has been found. It
includes full source code and documentation for the system, including
ITS version 671, DDT, TECO, MIDAS, (MAC)LISP, CHESS (MacHack), MUDDLE,
LOGO, MACSYMA, etc.
Warner Losh wrote:
>> A rather complete full dump of the MIT-AI PDP-10 from 1971 has been
>> found.
>
> Where? How? Will it be made available?
Where: In the "ToTS" archives, see
https://archivesspace.mit.edu/repositories/2/resources/1265
How: MIT has given me access to the archives, for research
Hello,
Early Zork source and binary files have been found on ITS backup tapes.
MIT previously released some December 1977 files here:
https://github.com/MITDDC/zork
Recently discovered files from January 1978 will appear soon.
Josh Dersch via cctalk writes:
> I'm also looking for earlier releases of X to run on this -- the VS100
> was the development platform for X (and W ran on it at one point as
> well). I haven't been able to track down anything prior to X10R3.
I asked the usual suspects (Reid, Asente, Kantarjiev)
Michael Kerpan wrote:
> AFS is also cool, but it's a separate project that's still actively
> maintained and (presumably) used.
MIT uses it, as does the student organization Stacken.
Josh Dersch wrote:
> I did recently get my 4404 running, at last.
Any Lisp screenshots?
I believe fibonacci is a required exercise for occations like this.
Dave Wade wrote:
> The docs for SIMH .TAP files are here:-
>
> http://simh.trailing-edge.com/docs/simh_magtape.pdf
>
> be careful as there are also non-SIMH .tap formats
Haha, yes very much so. For the fun of it, people like to mix and match
these options:
- Records padded to even length or not
Josh Dersch wrote:
> Not a ton to see, lisp-wise, it's just a port of Franz Lisp to
> Uniflex. I can try to benchmark fibonacci later this week if you want.
Thanks! I wasn't expecting a benchmark, just a little defun.
For the record, I have a Maclisp over here that will do (fib 40) in less
than
Murray McCullough wrote:
> We in the classic computer community need to know the history of our
> hobby
I for bigger iron history, I suggest "Dream Machine" by Waldrop. It's
not just about Licklider, though his is a very interesting story by
itself.
Michael Kerpan wrote:
> Something in another recent thread about LISP machines got me
> wondering: how many early graphical systems are well emulated (or
> emulated at all)? I know that there are more or less functional
> emulations of Alto, Star, and Lisa out there, but what about the
> various LI
Al Kossow wrote:
>> I usually use tapeutils:
>> https://github.com/brouhaha/tapeutils
>
> I should bug Eric about this, but the .tap files that library creates
> doesn't have the Supnik SIMH extensions
In case Eric doesn't have time to make updates, bug me instead.
I'm kind of maintaining that.
Al Kossow wrote:
>> I'm kind of maintaining that.
> where?
Here:
https://github.com/brouhaha/tapeutils
> and since your fscking around inside of it, have you added the
> Bordynuik extensions in the ToTS tape images?
No, but I certainly will if yout tell me what it is.
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
