On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Tony Duell wrote:
> I think at one time radio amateurs (at least over here) had to use 5 bit
> ITA2
> machines for RTTY.
Same here.
> It may even be to this day that RTTY implies that, and
> that ASCII is classed as 'data'.
The FCC order authorizing Amateur
> On 15 Feb 2017, at 21:24, SPC wrote:
>
> That's fine, Philipp (at least for me).
>
> Thanks for share this with us.
>
> Kind Regards
> Sergio Pedraja
Me too although I’m green with envy
Huw Davies | e-mail: huw.dav...@kerberos.davies.net.au
Melbourne| "If soccer was
I wrote:
> The FCC order authorizing Amateur Radio use of ASCII went into effect in
> March of 1980, but at the moment I can't track down a copy of the actual
> order.
>
Found it. "Deregulation of Part 97 of the Rules Regarding Emissions
Authorized in the Amateur Service", Third Report and Order
> On Feb 16, 2017, at 12:40 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Tony Duell wrote:
>
>> Over here, the only Teletypes we generally see are Model 33s. Even the
>> Model
>> 35 is very uncommon,
>
>
> In my experience, it's the same in the US: the model 33 has always been
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> I'm told that Teletype models 15, 19, and 28 were very common here. I've
> mostly seen models 15 and 28. I've only once seen a mdoel 32 (ITA2
> five-level version of model 33).
I'm helping restore a Model 19 with a friend (he's a WW II re-enact
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
> The LA36 was an excellent machine. Unlike the LA30, with its atrocious
> keyboard
> and a print mechanism that jammed about every 20th carriage return.
I have to disagree with that. The LA36 is horrible. There is a major
design misfeature.
From: cctalk [cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] on behalf of
cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org [cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 9:31 AM
To: bill.gunshan...@hotmail.com
Subject: confirm e3191f334ef584df40dccf9737f54f4dcd016a5d
__
Anybody interested in a copy of:
Communications Options Minireference Manual (EK-CMINI-RM-001)
USPS Flat Rate would be under $15.00 Throw in a couple more fo the trouble of
taking to the PO and it's yours.
bill
Lower that postage estimate. It fits in a padded envelope.
bill
Are you subscribed to both mailing lists?
On Feb 16, 2017 1:46 PM, "Bill Gunshannon"
wrote:
>
>
> From: cctalk [cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] on behalf of
> cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org [cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 201
From: cctalk [cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] on behalf of Adrian Stoness
[tdk.kni...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:48 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: RE: confirm e3191f334ef584df40dccf9737f54f4dcd016a5d
Ar
My B&L Stereozoom microscope didn't have any protection for the
objective lens assembly. It uses a rather oddball 38 mm threaded mount.
I thought that those with the same scope might be interested in the
adapter being sold as eBay 401250097157. It fits the 38mm thread on
the B&L perfoectly and
First of all THANKS. I hope this works out.
Some thoughts:
It looks like you have a JTAG connector on there - please keep that.
The CPLD you had on the last board, XC9572XL is a bit long in the tooth,
perhaps? Would you expect to use that one again, or a newer chip?
An area with place to moun
What's that, you say? You want to start planning for Vintage Computer
Festival West XII? Well mark your calendar!!! The show will be held
August 5-6 at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California.
Web page is here:
http://vcfed.org/wp/festivals/vintage-computer-festival-west-xi/
14 matches
Mail list logo
