Yeah, the versions > 6.5.22 can be nice for a variety of reasons if you've
got the later hardware. [I think the last one even had an
almost-totally-working default DHCP config out-of-box. ;) ]
I run it on systems where I can.
6.5.22 is nice because it doesn't have dependencies on some of the hard
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Ian Finder wrote:
> Yeah, the versions > 6.5.22 can be nice for a variety of reasons if you've
> got the later hardware. [I think the last one even had an
> almost-totally-working default DHCP config out-of-box. ;) ]
>
> I run it on systems where I can.
The only t
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, Ian Finder wrote:
Solution- netboot.
The CDs [there are a zillion point release layer things] are in EFS
format and can't be mounted on OS X or Windows. At some point I mounted
them all on Linux and wrote a script that copied the /dist folders to a
folder structure on an
Holm Tiffe wrote:
>
> Currently I'm fiddeling around with the old 8 Kbyte Z80 Basic Interpreter
> from TDL, found an Paper Tape Image here:
> http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/img54306/p/tdlsoft.zip
> on Dave Dunfields pages.
>
> I've used the 12K Version from TDL many years before on my home c
Amazing, thank you! I just finished putting together my dream system
from 1997 or so, an O2 with a 1600SW. I'm running the latest IRIX on
there, but have been looking of the development overlays.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:10 PM, geneb wrote:
>
>
> https://archive.org/details/cdromsoftware?&sort=-
Marc wrote...
-
I just resurrected a nice HP 2631G dot matrix line printer:
Like here: http://www.hpmuseum.net/display_item.php?hw=316
-
Very nice printer, I'm jealous. However, I do have an HP 2610A that will get
restored/running at some point. That thing
> I don't think they had ANY IDEA how many people were going to hit there
> servers back then lol! ! !
No, there was a good idea of the exploding usage figures, but the
estimate fell short for both the server usage and the modem usage. US
Robotics had trouble producing enough Total Control modems
FWIW, I can't see the pic.. just a page full of busy ads,
But I do remember the maze generator program.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Mike wrote:
> I have went over and over the code here
>
> http://www.atariarchives.org/basicgames/showpage.php?page=3
>
>
>
> but this is what I get???
>
Thanks for the pointer. I have an INDY with no software (well, at least
no convenient software - I have IRIX 5.22 as 3 tar.gz files.
I guess I will need to drag it out and if it still runs, get it a
simulated SCSI disk (I don't have any disks in mine).
JRJ
On 1/12/2016 2:10 PM, geneb wrote:
>
Hey everyone,
I was browsing and I noticed that there's another Sun SPARC posted up:
https://ibid.illinois.gov/item.php?id=170591
last time, I think there was one that went for a mere $5. Now of course,
you gotta move it or pay to have it moved, but if you're interested, act
now and start getting
[ tulsamike3434 (at) gmail.com wrote...]
>
> I have went over and over the code here
>
> http://www.atariarchives.org/basicgames/showpage.php?page=3
>
> but this is what I get???
>
> http://i64.tinypic.com/nci35y.jpg
>
> I know all the code is right is there a misprint in the book?
>
> I
> Hey everyone,
> I was browsing and I noticed that there's another Sun SPARC posted up:
>
> https://ibid.illinois.gov/item.php?id=170591
>
> last time, I think there was one that went for a mere $5. Now of course,
you gotta move it or pay to have it moved, but if you're interested, act
now and sta
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:45 AM, drlegendre . wrote:
> FWIW, I can't see the pic.. just a page full of busy ads,
>
> But I do remember the maze generator program.
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Mike wrote:
>
> > I have went over and over the code here
> >
> > http://www.atariarchives.o
I was reading in a dated magazine article on the "freedom to build(a
PC)": Well you can't build phone; can't build a car; can't build a
refrigerator; can't build a TV. Do we have the freedom to build a
computer? We did in the earliest days of the PC- the 8-bit era. Heck,
that's all one could do! It
On 1/13/2016 3:29 PM, Murray McCullough wrote:
I was reading in a dated magazine article on the "freedom to build(a
PC)": Well you can't build phone; can't build a car; can't build a
refrigerator; can't build a TV. Do we have the freedom to build a
computer? We did in the earliest days of the PC-
Can't build a TV? Heathkit.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:40 PM, ben wrote:
> On 1/13/2016 3:29 PM, Murray McCullough wrote:
>
>> I was reading in a dated magazine article on the "freedom to build(a
>> PC)": Well you can't build phone; can't build a car; can't build a
>> refrigerator; can't build a
Er...Heathkit is long gone.
However, there are at least a few car guys that might have a thing or
two to say about the original post.
--
Will
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Ian S. King wrote:
> Can't build a TV? Heathkit.
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:40 PM, ben wrote:
>
>> On 1/13/2016
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 3:01 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
>
> Er...Heathkit is long gone.
>
> However, there are at least a few car guys that might have a thing or
> two to say about the original post.
>
I agree. Kit cars are still around. ;-)
I don’t know about how easy it would be to bu
I have two sealed C5718A tapes that are free to the first person to ask
for them and pay shipping. I hate to throw out something that may still
be useful.
Can mail them for $5 (I think) to the USA, or local pickup.
John :-#)#
--
John's Jukes Ltd. 2343 Main St., Vancouver, BC, Canada V5T 3C9
C
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Guy Sotomayor wrote:
>
> > On Jan 13, 2016, at 3:01 PM, William Donzelli
> wrote:
> >
> > Er...Heathkit is long gone.
> >
> > However, there are at least a few car guys that might have a thing or
> > two to say about the original post.
> >
>
> I agree. Kit c
On 01/13/2016 04:29 PM, Murray McCullough wrote:
I was reading in a dated magazine article on the "freedom to build(a
PC)": Well you can't build phone; can't build a car; can't build a
refrigerator; can't build a TV. Do we have the freedom to build a
computer? We did in the earliest days of the P
> I don’t know about how easy it would be to build a TV (from scratch…something
> Heathkit didn’t do BTW…tuner was pre-assembled and “tuned”) given that the
> over-the-air signal is now a digital signal vs analog (ie I can’t recall if
> there’s any
> encryption involved that would require decrypti
On 1/13/2016 4:27 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
I don’t know about how easy it would be to build a TV (from scratch…something
Heathkit didn’t do BTW…tuner was pre-assembled and “tuned”) given that the
over-the-air signal is now a digital signal vs analog (ie I can’t recall if
there’s any
encryptio
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016, Mike Boyle wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:45 AM, drlegendre . wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I can't see the pic.. just a page full of busy ads,
> >
> > But I do remember the maze generator program.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Mike wrote:
> >
> > > I have went over and
On 01/13/2016 03:27 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
In the old days, the shitty kit TVs would have continuous tuners.
In prewar days, it seems that there more than a couple of offerings.
Didn't Meissner(they of the "Signal Shifter" VFO) offer a kit TV in the
30s/early 40s? I do remember the con
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 6:01 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
>
> Er...Heathkit is long gone.
It was for a while. But it's back. Check out heathkit.com.
paul
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 03:27 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
>
> In the old days, the shitty kit TVs would have continuous tuners.
>>
>
> In prewar days, it seems that there more than a couple of offerings.
> Didn't Meissner(they of the "Signal Shifter" VF
Is that the guy that bought the Heath IP?
--
Will
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>> On Jan 13, 2016, at 6:01 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
>>
>> Er...Heathkit is long gone.
>
> It was for a while. But it's back. Check out heathkit.com.
>
> paul
>
>
Must be. New kits, old manuals, upgrades for old kits -- at least a brief
glance gave me a pretty positive impression.
paul
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 8:07 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
>
> Is that the guy that bought the Heath IP?
>
> --
> Will
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Paul K
I think the Pilot brand TV at the museum may be continuous and yes has
chan 1
Ed!
In a message dated 1/13/2016 5:54:46 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
ccl...@sydex.com writes:
On 01/13/2016 03:27 PM, William Donzelli wrote:
> In the old days, the shitty kit TVs would have continuou
On 1/13/2016 7:15 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
> Must be. New kits, old manuals, upgrades for old kits -- at least a brief
> glance gave me a pretty positive impression.
>
> paul
>
Meh. It has taken them, like, 5 years to come out with this seriously
overpriced radio, and it isn't even supe
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Murray McCullough <
c.murray.mccullo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was reading in a dated magazine article on the "freedom to build(a
> PC)": Well you can't build phone; can't build a car; can't build a
> refrigerator; can't build a TV. Do we have the freedom to build
Looks like someone beat me to it. Congrats to whomever it is, I hope it's one
of us!
Marc
- Original Message -
From: "CuriousMarc"
To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'"
Sent: Tue 05 Jan 2016 03:34 PM
Subject: RE: Free HP 3000 Equipment for removal (Denver Craigsli
And I was already salivating for the 600 lines/minute HP2608 that was part of
the HP 3000 system since I have the interface card for it. Looks like it went
to a lucky someone else...
Marc
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jay West
Sent:
34 matches
Mail list logo
