RE: Immutability - was Re: ENIAC programming Was: release dates of early microcomputer operating systems, incl. Intel ISIS

2015-09-19 Thread Dave G4UGM
> -Original Message- > From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Toby Thain > Sent: 17 September 2015 18:30 > To: gene...@classiccmp.org; discuss...@classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off- > Topic Posts ; gene...@classiccmp.org > Subject: Immutability - was Re: ENIAC progr

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread jwsmobile
I have one each of 029 and 129. I was never that impressed with the 026 to pursue one. The 029 is in a state of disrepair, complete, the 129 is running when I turn it on. thanks Jim On 9/18/2015 7:16 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote: On 09/18/2015 06:33 PM, Don North wrote: Lucky it is not just scra

Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus - Re: ENIAC programming

2015-09-19 Thread Rod Smallwood
On 18/09/2015 14:33, tony duell wrote: Are there any computers that do let you put microcode into RAM now-days. "Now-days"? There are some that do that, some of which are still in operational shape. Some VAXen, in particular, have something called "writable control store", which is essentiall

RE: VAX 730 was Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus - Re: ENIAC programming

2015-09-19 Thread tony duell
> > The biggest risk I remember from the 730 design (I worked in the same hardware > lab, different project: 11/74 CIS) was the extensive use of PALs. This was the > first (I believe) project at DEC to use them, and they were basically buying > all It may well have been. Certainly the 11/730 is

Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus - Re: ENIAC programming

2015-09-19 Thread Paul Koning
> On Sep 19, 2015, at 5:25 AM, Rod Smallwood > wrote: > > Is an overlay self modifyig code? Yes (#2 in my list), but a controlled kind so it doesn't suffer from the maintainability issues of explicitly modified instructions. But it does require I-cache management, if the computer has an I-c

Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus - Re: ENIAC programming

2015-09-19 Thread Rod Smallwood
On 19/09/2015 14:03, Paul Koning wrote: On Sep 19, 2015, at 5:25 AM, Rod Smallwood wrote: Is an overlay self modifyig code? Yes (#2 in my list), but a controlled kind so it doesn't suffer from the maintainability issues of explicitly modified instructions. But it does require I-cache man

TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread Charles
Some years ago I recall reading about possibly modifying TSS/8 to run on more recent disks instead of the ancient DF32 (a whopping 32Kword fixed head disk with up to three more slaved platters). Did anyone actually implement the changes? I know it wouldn't work well on a moving-head disk without

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread John Wilson
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:50:04AM -0500, Charles wrote: >Some years ago I recall reading about possibly modifying TSS/8 to run on more >recent disks instead of the ancient DF32 (a whopping 32Kword fixed head disk >with up to three more slaved platters). Or the RF08/RS08 -- luxurious compared to a

DG S/130 front panel switches?

2015-09-19 Thread Jay West
So does anyone have a trashed/dead front panel for a Data General S/130 (S/200 would also work) that can be a donor? All I need are two switches/paddles/Covers, but my S/200 front panel is perfect so I don't want to rob from that for the S/130 project. One light blue, one dark blue... Crossing my f

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread COURYHOUSE
Seems like a ssd would make an idealfixed head replacement if it has to swap swap swap all the time? Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org) In a message dated 9/19/2015 9:44:07 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, wil...@dbit.com writes: On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:50:04AM

RE: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread Jay West
Ed wrote Seems like a ssd would make an idealfixed head replacement if it has to swap swap swap all the time? O.O J

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread COURYHOUSE
what is a O.O jay? In a message dated 9/19/2015 9:54:12 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, jw...@classiccmp.org writes: Ed wrote Seems like a ssd would make an idealfixed head replacement if it has to swap swap swap all the time? O.O J

Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus - Re: ENIAC programming

2015-09-19 Thread Liam Proven
On 19 September 2015 at 17:02, Rod Smallwood wrote: > Its a while back but I seem to remember in BASIC you replaced a set of line > numbers with another of the same range but different code. Blimey, I've never seen that. I do remember that ZX BASIC had a cool-but-dangerous feature: you could get

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Tothwolf
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015, Able Baker wrote: On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Todd Goodman wrote: On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Noel Chiappa wrote: Well, here's an 029 (not quite what the OP was looking for, but good enough for you all, I expect) for a not insane amount of money: http://www.ebay.com/itm/281796720725

Re: ISO 800-3827-10A_SunOS_Reference_Manual, part one

2015-09-19 Thread Josh Dersch
On 9/18/15 2:16 PM, Al Kossow wrote: On 9/18/15 1:52 PM, Josh Dersch wrote: I need to check my shelves for specifics, but I have a lot of SunOS documentation for early releases (1.0-3.0 or so) -- I can scan it if you don't already have it in the queue... - Josh I don't have anything

Re: ISO 800-3827-10A_SunOS_Reference_Manual, part one

2015-09-19 Thread Al Kossow
On 9/19/15 10:34 AM, Josh Dersch wrote: I also have a ton of stuff for 3.0, I'll see if there's anything I have that isn't already on Bitsavers. I'm working through 3.0, 4.0, and 4.1.1 this morning. 2.x would be good to scan. Is the KV-S3065W working OK? I still need to write you with my

eval() considered dodgy - Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus - Re: ENIAC programming

2015-09-19 Thread Toby Thain
On 2015-09-19 1:15 PM, Liam Proven wrote: On 19 September 2015 at 17:02, Rod Smallwood wrote: Its a while back but I seem to remember in BASIC you replaced a set of line numbers with another of the same range but different code. Blimey, I've never seen that. I do remember that ZX BASIC had a

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread Al Kossow
On 9/19/15 9:44 AM, John Wilson wrote: later TSS/8s already supported RKs as data disks, unless I've gone senile). No idea how they managed that -- UW-M's TSS/8 supported that. It should be in the monitor sources that we read.

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread COURYHOUSE
I would think the fixed head media swapped faster than the RK's unlessthee fixed head media was really slow... Ed# In a message dated 9/19/2015 10:45:53 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, a...@bitsavers.org writes: On 9/19/15 9:44 AM, John Wilson wrote: > later TSS/8s already

RE: Self modifying code, lambda calculus - Re: ENIAC programming

2015-09-19 Thread tony duell
> > Its a while back but I seem to remember in BASIC you replaced a set of line > > numbers with another of the same range but different code. > > Blimey, I've never seen that. A lot of disk-based BASICs had a statement that would merge a program from disk in this way. Sometimes the program had

Re: PDP-11 manuals scanned/scanning

2015-09-19 Thread Noel Chiappa
>> From: Jerome H. Fine >> a list of the actual links to the other PDF files which are >> available to be viewed would be appreciated. > I should probably throw together a web page with links to all the > PDP-11 files there (e.g. the one I just put together, of print sets

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Chuck Guzis
On 09/19/2015 01:12 AM, jwsmobile wrote: I have one each of 029 and 129. I was never that impressed with the 026 to pursue one. The 029 is in a state of disrepair, complete, the 129 is running when I turn it on. If you had a room full of 029, 026 and 024 keypunches, which would be used first

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread John Wilson
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 01:49:38PM -0400, couryho...@aol.com wrote: >I would think the fixed head media swapped faster than the RK's >unlessthee fixed head media was really slow... Ed# The DS/RS disks certainly weren't slow ... but an RK could still be fast enough to be useful.

Re: ISO 800-3827-10A_SunOS_Reference_Manual, part one

2015-09-19 Thread Josh Dersch
On 9/19/15 10:44 AM, Al Kossow wrote: On 9/19/15 10:34 AM, Josh Dersch wrote: I also have a ton of stuff for 3.0, I'll see if there's anything I have that isn't already on Bitsavers. I'm working through 3.0, 4.0, and 4.1.1 this morning. 2.x would be good to scan. Cool, I'll do that.

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread Al Kossow
On 9/19/15 11:12 AM, John Wilson wrote: but an RK could still be fast enough to be useful. When did the 4K user space(s?) actually swap? Did they round-robin or swap based on activity? I would think they would stay in place until cpu-bound jobs reached their time quantum. With only a couple of

Re: ISO 800-3827-10A_SunOS_Reference_Manual, part one

2015-09-19 Thread Al Kossow
On 9/19/15 12:29 PM, Josh Dersch wrote: I also have a lot of 1.1 stuff; considerably more than is on Bitsavers right now -- do you have more left to scan for that? I thought I did, but it isn't in the sun to-do directory I also have a dozen or so Software Technical Bulletins from 1986-1989

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Al Kossow
If you really wanted it that badly then you should've bought it. The only posts from "Able Baker" (whoever THAT might be) going back six years have been about the keypunch Dont' feed the troll

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread John Wilson
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:30:13PM -0700, Al Kossow wrote: >When did the 4K user space(s?) actually swap? Did they round-robin or swap >based on activity? I would think they would stay in place until cpu-bound >jobs reached their time quantum. With only a couple of people on a 32k >machine, it may

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread Al Kossow
On 9/19/15 1:45 PM, John Wilson wrote: BASIC runs in your 4 KW with you. I've never seen its sources The source is in with the UWM stuff. Look under http://bitsavers.org/bits/DEC/pdp8/ascii/basic /TSS/8 BASIC COMPILER (BASCOM) VERSION 18 / /REVISION: 13-AUG-71IDC/GWB/PJK / /C

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread COURYHOUSE
there was a time I really wanted a tss 8 system to use and even started colleting stuff for it in the late 70s but along came the 2000 f HP system I bought and I headed in that direction.. which gave be an HP destiny not a DEC Destiny. but still ... would love to fi

Re: eval() considered dodgy - Re: Self modifying code, lambda calculus - Re: ENIAC programming

2015-09-19 Thread ben
On 9/19/2015 11:45 AM, Toby Thain wrote: Thank God nobody would build such a thing into a modern language, especially not the one that runs in almost every browser... No it just crashes when the AD server or Flash stops. --Toby Ben.

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread ben
On 9/19/2015 1:30 PM, Al Kossow wrote: On 9/19/15 11:12 AM, John Wilson wrote: but an RK could still be fast enough to be useful. When did the 4K user space(s?) actually swap? Did they round-robin or swap based on activity? I would think they would stay in place until cpu-bound jobs reached th

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Able Baker
Not feeding a supernatural being from Norse mythology is your suggestion??Good idea.  From: Al Kossow To: cctalk@classiccmp.org Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 4:44 PM Subject: Re: IBM 026 > If you really wanted it that badly then you should've bought it. > The only posts fr

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Marc Verdiell
Todd, Well, hopefully this community is about celebrating people that have an interest in saving old valuable hardware. Not bullying them. Saving substantial hardware involves a substantial personal investment in time and money. So, Todd, well done, congratulations on your buy, and thanks for takin

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread jwsmobile
XYZZY. hopefully banishing the creature back to the cave. Plugh (for good measure) On 9/19/2015 3:10 PM, Able Baker wrote: Not feeding a supernatural being from Norse mythology is your suggestion??Good idea. From: Al Kossow To: cctalk@classiccmp.org Sent: Saturday, September 19,

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Mark J. Blair
> On Sep 19, 2015, at 16:32 , jwsmobile wrote: > > XYZZY. hopefully banishing the creature back to the cave. > > Plugh (for good measure) LOL! I'm not in equipment acquisition mode at the moment, but I wouldn't mind having a nice keypunch someday. And a pinball machine, too! -- Mark J.

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Todd Goodman
You're an ass. I don't know who pissed in your corn flakes but don't piss in mine. It's "common sense." I don't give a rat's ass what it's worth as scrap. * Able Baker [150918 21:10]: > Some people have more money than common cents...However, you only overpaid > for it by about $800.As scrap

RE: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Jay West
Marc wrote... Well, hopefully this community is about celebrating people that have an interest in saving old valuable hardware. Not bullying them. Ditto. Offlist email sent. Saving substantial hardware involves a substantial personal investment in time and money. So, Todd, well do

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread William Donzelli
> I don't know who pissed in your corn flakes but don't piss in mine. I am pretty sure I need to start using this phrase. -- Will

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Charles Anthony
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 4:32 PM, jwsmobile wrote: > XYZZY. hopefully banishing the creature back to the cave. > > Plugh (for good measure) > > Y2 -- Charles

Re:(was IBM 026) / is: Documation or card reader roller upgrades / successes.

2015-09-19 Thread jwsmobile
On 9/19/2015 4:41 PM, Jay West wrote: Marc wrote... Well, hopefully this community is about celebrating people that have an interest in saving old valuable hardware. Not bullying them. Ditto. Offlist email sent. Saving substantial hardware involves a substantial personal investm

Re: TSS/8 with modern disks?

2015-09-19 Thread John Wilson
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 01:50:00PM -0700, Al Kossow wrote: >>BASIC runs in your 4 KW with you. I've never seen its sources > >The source is in with the UWM stuff. Look under >http://bitsavers.org/bits/DEC/pdp8/ascii/basic How did I not notice that?! Awesome! Grabbed and reCRLFed. Thanks!! Jo

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Able Baker
Can't help you with a keypunch, but I was in the coin-operated pinball and arcade game business for 25 years... From: Mark J. Blair To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 7:34 PM Subject: Re: IBM 026 > On Sep 19, 2015, at 16:32 ,

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Able Baker
Hasta La Pastato a bunch of Intolerants From: Jay West To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 7:41 PM Subject: RE: IBM 026 Marc wrote... Well, hopefully this community is about celebrating people that have an interest in savin

RE: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Jay West
Subscription suspended. Next topic? -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Able Baker Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 8:06 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: IBM 026 oooh very thoughtful...you know your XY

Garage sale in Silicon Valley

2015-09-19 Thread Tom Watson
Various items that will probably be of interest here.  No reasonable offer refused. Hard copy??  You got it:DecWriter LA30  (modified to show lower case, yes it works).DecWriter LA36 (Decwriter II) Sun 4/110 floor standing model, 36 megs (if I remember correctly).Two SCSI boxes that go with the

Re: Garage sale in Silicon Valley

2015-09-19 Thread Cory Smelosky
What do you want for the 4/110 + SCSI? I'm in 95112. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 19, 2015, at 19:51, Tom Watson wrote: > > Various items that will probably be of interest here. No reasonable offer > refused. > Hard copy?? You got it:DecWriter LA30 (modified to show lower case, yes it > wo

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Todd Goodman
Thanks Marc, It may be a while before I get to restoring it but will definitely keep you in mind when I do. Thanks, Todd * Marc Verdiell [150919 18:36]: > Todd, > Well, hopefully this community is about celebrating people that have an > interest in saving old valuable hardware. Not bullying th

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Todd Goodman
* Jay West [150919 19:42]: > > Marc wrote... > > Well, hopefully this community is about celebrating people that have an > interest in saving old valuable hardware. Not bullying them. > > Ditto. Offlist email sent. > > > Saving substantial hardware involves a substantial personal

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Todd Goodman
* William Donzelli [150919 19:44]: > > I don't know who pissed in your corn flakes but don't piss in mine. > > I am pretty sure I need to start using this phrase. > > -- > Will I certainly can't claim it as original with me (from a friend who has passed who also used "don't sh*t in my mess kit"

Re: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread Fred Cisin
If somebody has one that they will sell for less than $100, then they can get away with saying that that is what it is worth. Otherwise, "value" has no quantifier other than what some buyer and some seller agree on. My parents sold their 57 Chevy station wagon for $50 in 1965. What is it wor

re: Backups [was Re: Is tape dead?]

2015-09-19 Thread John Foust
At 09:55 AM 9/18/2015, Fred Cisin wrote: >CryptoLocker has been around for a year. I don't think that McAfee nor AVG >see it. "Well, it's not a VIRUS, . . ." Yes and no. The bad guys work very hard to evade detection. They're always developing new wrappers to deliver the old payloads. The o

RE: IBM 026

2015-09-19 Thread tony duell
> > > XYZZY. hopefully banishing the creature back to the cave. > > > > Plugh (for good measure) > > > > > Y2 A hollow voice says "Cretin" -tony