Re: cc:Mail version numbers

2021-01-21 Thread Tomas By via cctalk
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:09:25 +0100, Sergio Pedraja wrote: > In my company we were using cc:Mail version 4 around 1994. I > installed that one, plus cc:mail for UUCP previously around 1993 in > one of our departments. Ok, thanks. On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:48:38 +0100, Tomas By via cctalk wrote: > R

Re: cc:Mail version numbers

2021-01-21 Thread Sergio Pedraja via cctalk
In my company we were using cc:Mail version 4 around 1994. I installed that one, plus cc:mail for UUCP previously around 1993 in one of our departments. Regards Sergio El jue., 21 ene. 2021 16:42, Tomas By via cctalk escribió: > People, > > I'm trying to wrap my head around c

Re: cc:Mail version numbers

2021-01-21 Thread Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
> > CC:Mail used to have "Versions" in the 80's if I recall. "Releases" > > came when Lotus bought them. > > Ok, so 1,2,3 happened quickly? At least from Lotus' point of view ... (scnr) -- personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodg

Re: cc:Mail version numbers

2021-01-21 Thread Tomas By via cctalk
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:59:25 +0100, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote: > [...] Easy to corrupt, big pain in the rear. [...] > still needed constant compacting and purging [...] Well, what I am at looking at is having one single user, and running it emulated, so I think it seems like a good solution (onl

Re: cc:Mail version numbers

2021-01-21 Thread Tomas By via cctalk
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:00:42 +0100, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote: > CC:Mail used to have "Versions" in the 80's if I recall. "Releases" > came when Lotus bought them. Ok, so 1,2,3 happened quickly? Or did they start at 2 or 3? /Tomas

Re: cc:Mail version numbers

2021-01-21 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
CC:Mail used to have "Versions" in the 80's if I recall. "Releases" came when Lotus bought them. C On 1/21/2021 10:48 AM, Tomas By via cctalk wrote: R3 1992 also On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:42:32 +0100, Tomas By wrote: Release Database Appeared in 1?? ? 2?6?

Re: cc:Mail version numbers

2021-01-21 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
I was using CC:Mail at Westinghouse in 1988. Very small mailbox limits, I remember having to run compacts on the Novell server a lot back then. The system was using a flat file database on the server, each client would interact directly with the mail database. Easy to corrupt, big pain in the

Re: cc:Mail version numbers

2021-01-21 Thread Tomas By via cctalk
R3 1992 also On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 16:42:32 +0100, Tomas By wrote: > Release Database Appeared in > 1?? ? > 2?6? ? > 3?6? 1992 > 4?6 ? > 5 6 1995 > 6 8 1996 > 7?8

cc:Mail version numbers

2021-01-21 Thread Tomas By via cctalk
People, I'm trying to wrap my head around cc:Mail version numbers. Various products such as Mobile and Gateways have their own separate series of numbers, but the main products seem to be as follows. Release Database Appeared in 1?? ? 2?6?