RE: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Jay West via cctalk
Posts ; Jay West Subject: Re: Why women were the first computer programmers but you admonish one publicly, and not the other that solicited the response. What am I supposed to read into that? M. On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 at 9:40 am, Jay West via cctalk mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org

RE: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Jay West via cctalk
I wrote... > I did not say sexism was ok. To which toby replied... >That is, indeed, the message you are sending No. It is not. It is what you are saying that I intend. And not that I have to explain myself but historically when anyone posts something I'd like to curb, I generally do it o

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread js--- via cctalk
.. On 8/24/2017 6:14 PM, Toby Thain via cctalk wrote: Please note that I said to keep things in a historical perspective and on-topic. I don't think that is saying sexism is ok. On a technical list with adults, I believe that when someone posts something on-topic which has portions you do no

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Alan Hightower via cctalk
I'm a little surprised to see a list administrator specifically calling out a critical response to an original statement that seemed destined to provoke one; and not including the original post and poster in the admonishment. It may lead one to presume Jay sympathizes with the original statement

RE: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Jay West via cctalk
Seth, my wife is one of those engineers that you speak of. She has 30+ years at a 'well known global engineering company'. She has succeeded greatly and she has done so specifically by insisting that she be treated the same, not differently. She discusses the stance that you wrote below very of

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Toby Thain via cctalk
On 2017-08-24 6:11 PM, Jay West via cctalk wrote: > Several wrote... > >> You may feel free to remove me from this list. > And >> Likewise. > And >> That's it for me and this list. > > I did not say sexism was ok. That is, indeed, the message you are sending, with this weird 'reading into it',

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Mike Stein via cctalk
- Original Message - From: "Chris Hanson via cctalk" Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 6:33 PM Subject: Re: Why women were the first computer programmers >> That's crude, ignorant, sexist, and wrong. > He didn’t call Rod any names or personally attack

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Warner Losh via cctalk
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Seth Morabito via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > This is not political correctness. It's basic human decency and > giving everyone an equal opportunity to be a good or a bad engineer on > their own merits. > Keep in mind we can't say, with any degree of

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Tapley, Mark via cctalk
On Aug 23, 2017, at 11:14 PM, Rod Smallwood via cctalk wrote: > I am all for female equality (but not superiority) > > The main reason for the unbalance is the same in all work situations. > Its called Maternal Dropout. > Women are genetically programmed to be mothers and child care specialists

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Seth Morabito via cctalk
I've been a list member on and off (mostly on) for a good 20 years now. I've seen my fare share of flame wars, and they're never fun. I would never want to add to frivolus attacks or general noise. But I cannot let this thread go without feedback. Every time this argument appears, I come back to t

RE: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Jecel Assumpcao Jr. via cctalk
Jay West wrote (among other things): > On a technical list with adults, I believe that when someone posts something > on-topic which has portions you do not personally like that perhaps the adult > thing is to take the points that are in-common and expand on them, leaving > the points behind that y

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Chris Hanson via cctalk
On Aug 24, 2017, at 3:11 PM, Jay West via cctalk wrote: > > While one could argue about the intent of the original poster, one cannot > argue that the personal attack - and namecalling - from Evan was acceptable. > It was not. Evan did not engage in either a personal attack or name-calling. R

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Josh Dersch via cctalk
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Jay West via cctalk wrote: > Several wrote... > > > You may feel free to remove me from this list. > And > > Likewise. > And > > That's it for me and this list. > > I did not say sexism was ok. Those that are reading that in to it - please > click unsubscribe as y

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Mike Stein via cctalk
ry to hear it; you'll be missed. Goodbye. m - Original Message - From: "Chris Hanson via cctalk" To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 5:34 PM Subject: Re: Why women were the first computer programmers On

RE: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Jay West via cctalk
Several wrote... > You may feel free to remove me from this list. And > Likewise. And > That's it for me and this list. I did not say sexism was ok. Those that are reading that in to it - please click unsubscribe as you are obviously looking for an excuse to do so regardless. Or perhaps you're

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Chris Hanson via cctalk
On Aug 24, 2017, at 2:27 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Jay West via cctalk > wrote: > >> It was written... >> --- >> That's crude, ignorant, sexist, and wrong. >> --- >> >> The above statement sounds to me as being intol

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Jason Scott via cctalk
That's it for me and this list. If anyone needs to reach me on vintage/computer/other subjects, please write to me at jsc...@archive.org, ja...@textfiles.com, or @textfiles on twitter. On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Jay West via cctalk wrote: > > It was written... > --- > That'

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Josh Dersch via cctalk
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Jay West via cctalk wrote: > > It was written... > --- > That's crude, ignorant, sexist, and wrong. > --- > > The above statement sounds to me as being intolerant, hatespeech, and > judgemental. Why do you think you have the right t

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Daniel Seagraves via cctalk
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Jay West via cctalk > wrote: > > The world has gone mad with political correctness, and I will - at least in > the very tiny corner of it that I control - not allow it. OK then, which opinion is safely politically incorrect? Are women biologically inferior to m

RE: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Jay West via cctalk
It was written... --- That's crude, ignorant, sexist, and wrong. --- The above statement sounds to me as being intolerant, hatespeech, and judgemental. Why do you think you have the right to determine that and apply labels to someone? The world has gone mad with

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Evan Koblentz via cctalk
Well, this is the stupidest thing I've read today. "Do Not Feed The Troll" should go without saying. Really. If this list becomes another partisan political list - I'm out of here... Lyle There's nothing political about "men shouldn't act like pigs".

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Evan Koblentz via cctalk
Once programming moved from formal analysis and form filling eg COBOL into an interactive creative activity requiring unitary focus women had to work much harder to compete. Can women be good programmers. Certainly, but they are hampered by natural forces that they have to overcome That's cr

RE: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread W2HX via cctalk
Oh, brother. 1955 is calling. -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Rod Smallwood via cctalk Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 12:15 AM To: Brian Walenz via cctalk Subject: Re: Why women were the first computer programmers On 24/08/2017 04

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-24 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 08/23/2017 11:27 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote: On 8/23/2017 9:14 PM, Rod Smallwood via cctalk wrote: Can women be good programmers. Certainly, but they are hampered by natural forces that they have to overcome. Men just move into the vacuum caused by this situation. Well, this is

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-23 Thread Brent Hilpert via cctalk
On 2017-Aug-23, at 9:55 PM, Lyle Bickley via cctalk wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:45:12 -0700 > Lyndon Nerenberg via cctalk wrote: > >>> On Aug 23, 2017, at 9:27 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk >>> wrote: >>> >>> Well, this is the stupidest thing I've read today. >> >> "Do Not Feed The Troll" s

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-23 Thread Lyle Bickley via cctalk
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:45:12 -0700 Lyndon Nerenberg via cctalk wrote: > > On Aug 23, 2017, at 9:27 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk > > wrote: > > > > Well, this is the stupidest thing I've read today. > > "Do Not Feed The Troll" should go without saying. Really. If this list becomes another par

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-23 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg via cctalk
> On Aug 23, 2017, at 9:27 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk > wrote: > > Well, this is the stupidest thing I've read today. "Do Not Feed The Troll" should go without saying. Really.

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-23 Thread Josh Dersch via cctalk
On 8/23/2017 9:14 PM, Rod Smallwood via cctalk wrote: On 24/08/2017 04:10, Brian Walenz via cctalk wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: "Nathan Ensmenger has observed" he's written a whole book on the subject "The Computer Boys Take Over" https://mitpress.mit.

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-23 Thread Rod Smallwood via cctalk
On 24/08/2017 04:10, Brian Walenz via cctalk wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: "Nathan Ensmenger has observed" he's written a whole book on the subject "The Computer Boys Take Over" https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/computer-boys-take-over And: "Recording Ge

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-23 Thread Brian Walenz via cctalk
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:59 PM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: > > "Nathan Ensmenger has observed" > > he's written a whole book on the subject "The Computer Boys Take Over" > https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/computer-boys-take-over > > And: "Recording Gender", Janet Abbate (also mentioned in the ar

Re: Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-23 Thread Al Kossow via cctalk
On 8/23/17 5:17 PM, Kevin Parker via cctalk wrote: > > > http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/careers-and-money/women-were-the-first-computer-programmers-then-men-crowd > ed-them-out-20170822-gy1e8r.html "Nathan Ensmenger has observed" he's written a whole book on the su

Why women were the first computer programmers

2017-08-23 Thread Kevin Parker via cctalk
This most interesting article appeared in The Age (Melbourne) today. Thought it might be of interest to other list members. http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/careers-and-money/women-were-the-first-computer-programmers-then-men-crowd ed-them-out-20170822-gy1e8r.html