Re: server maintenance

2016-07-10 Thread Stefan Skoglund (lokal
lör 2016-07-09 klockan 13:04 +1000 skrev Doug Jackson: > Umm > > Weren't our computers designed before quality change control existed... > > (Duck) > > Doug Umm, im reading James W Cortada's book Before The Computer. The E Remington company got from 1865 far less custom from it's largest

Re: server maintenance

2016-07-08 Thread Swift Griggs
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Jim Brain wrote: > Is there a defined maintenance window for the list? Has it been > published? Will users be impacted by this change? If so, I am not sure I > am comfortable with the server being unavailable on a Friday night. > We're still using the service at 10PM. Has

Re: server maintenance

2016-07-08 Thread Doug Jackson
Umm Weren't our computers designed before quality change control existed... (Duck) Doug On 9 July 2016 10:39:55 am AEST, "Ryan K. Brooks" wrote: > >On 7/8/16 7:11 PM, Jim Brain wrote: >> On 7/8/2016 5:09 PM, Guy Sotomayor Jr wrote: >>> Thanks Jay. Hopefully this will avoid a long thread o

Re: server maintenance

2016-07-08 Thread Ryan K. Brooks
On 7/8/16 7:11 PM, Jim Brain wrote: On 7/8/2016 5:09 PM, Guy Sotomayor Jr wrote: Thanks Jay. Hopefully this will avoid a long thread on why classiccmp is down and folks aren’t receiving messages. ;-) TTFN - Guy On Jul 8, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Jay West wrote: The classiccmp VM will go down to

Re: server maintenance

2016-07-08 Thread Jim Brain
On 7/8/2016 5:09 PM, Guy Sotomayor Jr wrote: Thanks Jay. Hopefully this will avoid a long thread on why classiccmp is down and folks aren’t receiving messages. ;-) TTFN - Guy On Jul 8, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Jay West wrote: The classiccmp VM will go down tonight around 10pm-ish CST. There is no

Re: server maintenance

2016-07-08 Thread Guy Sotomayor Jr
Thanks Jay. Hopefully this will avoid a long thread on why classiccmp is down and folks aren’t receiving messages. ;-) TTFN - Guy > On Jul 8, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Jay West wrote: > > The classiccmp VM will go down tonight around 10pm-ish CST. There is nothing > wrong with the VM, but the NAS it'