On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 09:12 -0400, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
> > We already have GnuCOBOL which works just fine (most of the time).
>
> Yes, although that one is apparently more limited. And GnuCOBOL is a
> COBOL to C converter. gcobol is a full front end. One difference is
> that GDB will
On 3/15/22 13:31, Paul Koning wrote:
On Mar 15, 2022, at 1:18 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
wrote:
On 3/15/22 12:57, Paul Koning wrote:
...
One difference is that GDB will be able to do COBOL mode debugging.
Never had a reason to try it but I thought GnuCOBOL allowed the use
of GDB.
> On Mar 15, 2022, at 1:18 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 3/15/22 12:57, Paul Koning wrote:
>>> ...
>
One difference is that GDB will be able to do COBOL mode debugging.
>>>
>>> Never had a reason to try it but I thought GnuCOBOL allowed the use
>>> of GDB. FAQ seems t
On 3/15/22 12:57, Paul Koning wrote:
On Mar 15, 2022, at 12:39 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
wrote:
On 3/15/22 09:12, Paul Koning wrote:
On Mar 14, 2022, at 9:05 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
wrote:
On 3/14/22 20:53, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Saw a note on the GCC list that I tho
> On Mar 15, 2022, at 12:39 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 3/15/22 09:12, Paul Koning wrote:
>>> On Mar 14, 2022, at 9:05 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/14/22 20:53, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Saw a note on the GCC list that I thought some he
On 3/15/22 09:12, Paul Koning wrote:
On Mar 14, 2022, at 9:05 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
wrote:
On 3/14/22 20:53, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Saw a note on the GCC list that I thought some here might find interesting: it
announces the existence (not quite done but getting there) of
On 3/14/22 19:53, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Saw a note on the GCC list that I thought some here might find interesting: it
announces the existence (not quite done but getting there) of a COBOL language
front end for GCC. Interesting. For those who deal in legacy COBOL
applications that w
> On Mar 14, 2022, at 9:05 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 3/14/22 20:53, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
>> Saw a note on the GCC list that I thought some here might find interesting:
>> it announces the existence (not quite done but getting there) of a COBOL
>> language front
On 3/14/2022 6:53 PM, ben via cctalk wrote:
Good question. Does any one have card reader hooked up to modern machine?
paul
Ben.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022, jim stephens via cctalk wrote:
I have a serial Documation M-1000. Not running at the moment, but adequate
for such
Two more M-600
I have a serial Documation M-1000. Not running at the moment, but
adequate for such
Two more M-600 parallel, and I think the number for the dinky one is
M-150, also parallel.
interface would go thru an arduino with 5v board easily to a USB serial
or whatever (Ethernet maybe)
thanks
Jim
On
On 2022-03-14 6:53 p.m., Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Saw a note on the GCC list that I thought some here might find interesting: it
announces the existence (not quite done but getting there) of a COBOL language
front end for GCC. Interesting. For those who deal in legacy COBOL
applications
On 3/14/22 20:53, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
Saw a note on the GCC list that I thought some here might find interesting: it
announces the existence (not quite done but getting there) of a COBOL language
front end for GCC. Interesting. For those who deal in legacy COBOL
applications that w
12 matches
Mail list logo
