On 3/12/16 8:11 AM, Antonio Carlini wrote:
It's probably worth experimenting a little
No, it's not.
I'm sorry, but file size matters squat compared to the time it's
going to take to scan them.
> On Mar 12, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Al Kossow wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/12/16 8:11 AM, Antonio Carlini wrote:
>
>> It's probably worth experimenting a little
>
> No, it's not.
> I'm sorry, but file size matters squat compared to the time it's
> going to take to scan them.
I agree. Also, converting f
On 12/03/16 16:04, j...@cimmeri.com wrote:
Can that scanner produce anything other than massive .png files?
I wonder whether it can do B&W G4 encoded at something like 600dpi. That
should
cut the size down a bit and produce something that perhaps could then be
OCRd.
My recollection is tha
Can that scanner produce anything other
than massive .png files?
- J.
On 3/11/2016 9:12 PM, devin davison wrote:
Well, I have the scanner and the time, I am going to put in online anyways.
It may not be the full source, but perhaps it will come in handy for
someone else.
I only spent a few
Well, I have the scanner and the time, I am going to put in online anyways.
It may not be the full source, but perhaps it will come in handy for
someone else.
I only spent a few minutes scanning those 12 pages. It was a just a quick
initial run of the scanner to learn how to operate it and save th
On 12/03/16 00:30, devin davison wrote:
I made a trip to the library today and set up the reader. Expensive nice
piece of equipment, however it is going to take a long time to scan it all.
I am still uncertain as to weather this is the source or the compiler
output, as some people here suggested
I made a trip to the library today and set up the reader. Expensive nice
piece of equipment, however it is going to take a long time to scan it all.
I am still uncertain as to weather this is the source or the compiler
output, as some people here suggested it may be. Even with this full set,
is th
On 09/03/16 20:44, devin davison wrote:
I do not know much at all about what it would take to compile this
into a working system. My first step is going to be to get over to the
library and get everything into a digital format. Ill be putting
everything i scan up online.
The last set of micro
I do not know much at all about what it would take to compile this into a
working system. My first step is going to be to get over to the library and
get everything into a digital format. Ill be putting everything i scan up
online.
If there is a copy of the source on CD that someone can spare that
On 09/03/16 15:17, Mouse wrote:
I think this is likely to be source listings (ie the
assembler/compiler output after assembling/compiling the actual
source code), at least that's what I have. [...]
For many purposes, of course, that's just as good, maybe even better.
If you really want to rebu
> I think this is likely to be source listings (ie the
> assembler/compiler output after assembling/compiling the actual
> source code), at least that's what I have. [...]
For many purposes, of course, that's just as good, maybe even better.
If you really want to rebuild the system yourself, you
>
> I purchased a DEC VMS 4.4 source code microfiche set a while back. A buddy
> of mine works at a local library where there is a fancy microfiche scanner,
> I'm planning to scan it all. Some of the film is scratched pretty bad, does
> anyone else around here have this set, so that i can recover t
On 3/8/2016 1:35 PM, devin davison wrote:
I purchased a DEC VMS 4.4 source code microfiche set a while back. A
buddy of mine works at a local library where there is a fancy
microfiche scanner, I'm planning to scan it all. Some of the film is
scratched pretty bad, does anyone else around here hav
13 matches
Mail list logo
