Re: VCF Southeast Photos, Now Thinking Machines

2019-05-07 Thread Sytse van Slooten via cctalk
Thanks! Had a good bit of fun reading that. I’m not going to try building an FPGA version though. Not yet. > On 3 May 2019, at 22:26, Jan Adelsbach via cctalk > wrote: > > On 5/3/19 8:02 PM, Sytse van Slooten via cctalk wrote: It's a CM-2. The problem with most CM-2s - aside not working

Re: VCF Southeast Photos, Now Thinking Machines

2019-05-03 Thread Jan Adelsbach via cctalk
On 5/3/19 8:02 PM, Sytse van Slooten via cctalk wrote: It's a CM-2. The problem with most CM-2s - aside not working in 2019 - is most were never fully populated with card cages in all 8 hyper-cubes. That particular machine only has card cages in 2 of the hyper-cubes. The other 6 are empty.

Re: VCF Southeast Photos, Now Thinking Machines

2019-05-03 Thread Sytse van Slooten via cctalk
>> It's a CM-2. The problem with most CM-2s - aside not working in 2019 - is >> most were never fully populated with card cages in all 8 hyper-cubes. That >> particular machine only has card cages in 2 of the hyper-cubes. The other 6 >> are empty. I'm not sure a machine with max 64K processo

Re: VCF Southeast Photos, Now Thinking Machines

2019-05-01 Thread Ethan O'Toole via cctalk
It's a CM-2. The problem with most CM-2s - aside not working in 2019 - is most were never fully populated with card cages in all 8 hyper-cubes. That particular machine only has card cages in 2 of the hyper-cubes. The other 6 are empty. I'm not sure a machine with max 64K processors was ever