> On Jun 25, 2015, at 1:49 PM, tony duell wrote:
>
...
>
>> I still have a photo copied out of the 1980s magazine RSTS Professional,
>> which claimed to show how to convert
>> thick to thin Ethernet. The simple answer is “with a coax connector
>> adapter” since both are 50 ohm coax. T
> >> From: John Wilson
> >
> >> I chose the digital version of EE as my major precisely because I knew
> >> I'd flunk Fields and Waves. Transmission lines are black magic as far
> >> as I'm concerned!
I really do fail to see how you can possibly understand or design digital
systems
without unders
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>
>> From: John Wilson
>
>> I chose the digital version of EE as my major precisely because I knew
>> I'd flunk Fields and Waves. Transmission lines are black magic as far
>> as I'm concerned!
>
> I too have a hard time with analog in general
On 2015-06-25 12:02 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> From: John Wilson
> I chose the digital version of EE as my major precisely because I knew
> I'd flunk Fields and Waves. Transmission lines are black magic as far
> as I'm concerned!
I too have a hard time with analog in general,
> From: John Wilson
> I chose the digital version of EE as my major precisely because I knew
> I'd flunk Fields and Waves. Transmission lines are black magic as far
> as I'm concerned!
I too have a hard time with analog in general, but transmission lines I seem
to be OK with.
The
