Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-17 Thread Chris Hanson via cctalk
On Aug 14, 2021, at 3:54 PM, J. David Bryan via cctalk wrote: > I guess the operative question is whether people tend to view PDF pages on > a server or download files and view them locally. Even when viewing files locally, linearization is important for not having to load too much of the fil

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-17 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On Aug 17, 2021, at 1:47 PM, ED SHARPE via cctalk > wrote: > > but does tumble OVER compress things? Over compress? The normal, and only really valid, practice with black & white documents is lossless compression, where that term has no meaning. There are those who don't understand th

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-17 Thread Liam Proven via cctalk
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 23:21, Wayne Sudol via cctech wrote: > > Out of curiosity, is there a reason you do not use Acrobat for creating > pdfs? I have been making PDFs for at least 20 years now, probably more. AFAIK I have _never_ used Acrobat to create them. I print from LibreOffice to its PDF g

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-16 Thread J. David Bryan via cctalk
On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 22:46, Wayne S wrote: > I asked because i was curious if what you wanted to do could not be > done in Acrobat. Never having used Acrobat, I cannot say. -- Dave

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-16 Thread J. David Bryan via cctalk
On Monday, August 16, 2021 at 14:20, Wayne Sudol wrote: > Out of curiosity, is there a reason you do not use Acrobat for > creating pdfs? Primarily because I have not purchased a license for Acrobat. Also, when I started scanning manuals ten years ago, Al Kossow recommended tumble, which work

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-16 Thread J. David Bryan via cctalk
On Sunday, August 15, 2021 at 1:20, Alexander Schreiber wrote: > My current toolchain for that: Thanks; that was quite helpful. One aspect that I find of great assistance in navigating large PDF manuals is original page numbers. Often a manual will contain references, e.g., to "page 4-13" or

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-15 Thread Peter Corlett via cctalk
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 01:29:37AM -0400, J. David Bryan via cctalk wrote: > On Sunday, August 15, 2021 at 12:55, Kevin Parker wrote: [...] >> ...but on my limited understanding it required support from the web >> server to actually give effect to this. > I believe that's right. At least all of the

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-15 Thread J. David Bryan via cctalk
On Sunday, August 15, 2021 at 12:55, Kevin Parker wrote: > I think it used to be called Byte Range Serving i.e. it would only > serve up the page requested so URL's like > somewebsite.com/myfile.pdf#page=4 would only send page 4 to the browser > - I think this is what you are talking about That'

RE: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-14 Thread Kevin Parker via cctalk
Hi Dave - I think it used to be called Byte Range Serving i.e. it would only serve up the page requested so URL's like somewebsite.com/myfile.pdf#page=4 would only send page 4 to the browser - I think this is what you are talking about Back in my earlier PDF days and the web we were quite a**l abo

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-14 Thread Alexander Schreiber via cctalk
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 06:15:21PM -0400, J. David Bryan via cctech wrote: > On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 17:23, Alexandre Souza wrote: > > > Is any kind of standard, recomendation, group, mail list, to discuss > > the subject? > > I am not aware of any. I started with Al Kossow's basic recomm

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-14 Thread J. David Bryan via cctalk
On Saturday, August 14, 2021 at 12:22, ben via cctech wrote: > I tend to have my PDF's on portable device, so PDF's need to be easy > to use on those devices. Linearizing keeps PDFs as complete files but rearranges (and expands) them internally so that individual pages can be rendered from a sub

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-14 Thread J. David Bryan via cctalk
On Saturday, August 14, 2021 at 11:04, Al Kossow via cctech wrote: > Jay Jager is trying to deal with scanning manuals with colored text > and backgrounds. Is your workflow for dealing with this around > somewhere? I'm still using the same set of programs that I sent to you in April 2016 (as im

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-14 Thread ben via cctalk
On 2021-08-14 12:04 p.m., Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: On 8/13/21 3:15 PM, J. David Bryan via cctech wrote: On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 17:23, Alexandre Souza wrote: Is any kind of standard, recomendation, group, mail list, to discuss the subject? I am not aware of any.  I started with Al K

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-14 Thread Al Kossow via cctalk
On 8/13/21 3:15 PM, J. David Bryan via cctech wrote: On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 17:23, Alexandre Souza wrote: Is any kind of standard, recomendation, group, mail list, to discuss the subject? I am not aware of any. I started with Al Kossow's basic recommendations, modified slightly: -

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-13 Thread Tony Aiuto via cctalk
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021, 6:15 PM J. David Bryan via cctech < cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote: > On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 17:23, Alexandre Souza wrote: > > > Is any kind of standard, recomendation, group, mail list, to discuss > > the subject? > > I am not aware of any. I started with Al Kossow's b

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-13 Thread J. David Bryan via cctalk
On Friday, August 13, 2021 at 17:23, Alexandre Souza wrote: > Is any kind of standard, recomendation, group, mail list, to discuss > the subject? I am not aware of any. I started with Al Kossow's basic recommendations, modified slightly: - scan at 600 dpi - use TIFF G4 where feasible -

Re: Linearizing PDF scans

2021-08-13 Thread Alexandre Souza via cctalk
Hey Dave, I've been digitizing docs for free for years Is any kind of standard, recomendation, group, mail list, to discuss the subject? All pdfs in www.tabalabs.com.br/esquemateca were scanned by me. I'm always open to critics and suggestions thanks Alexandre, PU2SEX ---8<---Corte aqui---8<--- ht