On 14.06.2017 17:27, Jon Elson via cctalk wrote:
Silkscreen is actually pretty low-tech. Anybody can do it in their
basement.
This is pure theory :-)
Doing "some silkscreen" is pretty easy, yes. You don't need too much for it.
(I made a large volume of low-density circuit boards a long
time
> On Jun 14, 2017, at 11:27 AM, Jon Elson via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> ...
> Silkscreened inks are REALLY durable! Think of some drinking glasses with
> logos on them. (Now, I know those are fired onto the glass, so even more
> durable.) I have doubts some kind of ink that could be printed by a
On 06/14/2017 01:42 AM, Rod Smallwood via cctalk wrote:
Hi
We are ok for now but for future and as yet not
designed panels I can still draw them. (I'm old but not
that old)
However with modern technology there has to be a
multi-pass printer that can print on perspex (plexiglass)
and cl
On 14.06.2017 11:04, Peter Corlett via cctalk wr
This is perhaps an obvious question, but have you asked a professional printer
for advice? They are likely to offer to silk-screen onto Perspex for you at a
price and quality you're unlikely to manage yourself.
AFAIK he has had the boards perfe
Hi,
On 14.06.2017 10:41, Paul Birkel via cctalk wrote:
How about adopting the "fallback" photorealistic approach that Oscar V. is
using for the PiDP-8 panels?
Very bad idea. They just don't look good enough. And they can't meet the
real colors.
Nothing you can print with a "normal" colour pr
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:42:44AM +0100, Rod Smallwood via cctalk wrote:
[...]
> However with modern technology there has to be a multi-pass printer that can
> print on perspex (plexiglass) and closely simulate silk screening
This is perhaps an obvious question, but have you asked a professional
How about adopting the "fallback" photorealistic approach that Oscar V. is
using for the PiDP-8 panels?
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Rod Smallwood
via cctalk
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 2:43 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and
