> On Jan 23, 2018, at 4:17 PM, Glen Slick via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk
> wrote:
>>
>> The cable spec given in the Ethernet standard doesn't mention additional
>> shielding. It does differ from RG-8 in that it calls for foam dielectric
>>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk
wrote:
>
> The cable spec given in the Ethernet standard doesn't mention additional
> shielding. It does differ from RG-8 in that it calls for foam dielectric and
> a higher velocity factor (0.77 rather than 0.66). Another common differe
> On Jan 23, 2018, at 1:35 PM, Mark Kahrs via cctech
> wrote:
>
> A few notes:
> ...
> The vampire tap transceiver used RG-8 cable originally. That's before they
> added the lines around the cable and added additional shielding.
The cable spec given in the Ethernet standard doesn't mention a
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Mark Kahrs via cctech <
cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> A few notes:
>
> The experimental Ethernet speed was in fact 2.94 MHz: It's the Alto clock
> divided by 2.
>
> The Alto based printer was called "SLOT" -- Scanning Laser Output
> Terminal. It was plugged int
