RE: KD11-E/EA microcode flow diagrams

2019-01-08 Thread Paul Birkel via cctalk
>-Original Message- >From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Fritz Mueller >via cctalk >Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 1:43 PM >To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts >Subject: Re: KD11-E/EA microcode flow diagrams > >... I

Re: KD11-E/EA microcode flow diagrams

2019-01-08 Thread Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> From: Fritz Mueller > I should go read up on QSIC. There's not much on the Web, alas. We have two working prototypes (a wirewrap QBUS mother-board with bus transceivers, level converters, etc, connected to an FPGA prototyp ung card by flat cables), and working FPGA code to emulate an R

Re: KD11-E/EA microcode flow diagrams

2019-01-08 Thread Fritz Mueller via cctalk
> On Jan 8, 2019, at 9:23 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk > wrote: > > ... Dave B and I need a PDP-11 in the FPGA on the QSIC, to run the USB > protocol on; rather than using a microcontroller, we decided the hack value > of putting an -11 in there was too much to resist. Fun! I should go read

Re: KD11-E/EA microcode flow diagrams

2019-01-08 Thread Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> From: Fritz Mueller >> the last microinstruction for RTI/RTT has been moved from 002 -> 744. > So what's at 002 now? Maybe something new was required there by micro > branch/fork logic, so the original contents had to be moved? Well, it turns out I've been transcribing the ucod

Re: KD11-E/EA microcode flow diagrams

2019-01-05 Thread Fritz Mueller via cctalk
> On Jan 5, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk > wrote: > > The only difference I can see (I compared page by page, to see if each page > had the same microinstructions on it) is that on sheet 17; the last > microinstruction for RTI/RTT has been moved from 002 -> 744. (The actual > micr