ssage-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Corey Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 4:27 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts
Cc: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Intel C1101A
I do notice these "schlock" IC sellers actually
-Original Message-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of jim stephens
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 9:28 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Intel C1101A
On 12/6/2016 8:46 AM, Brad H wrote:
> I kind of thought that mi
ssage-
From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Corey Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 4:27 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts
Cc: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Intel C1101A
I do notice these "schlock" IC sellers actually
-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Corey Cohen
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 4:27 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts
Cc: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Intel C1101A
I do notice these "schlock" IC sellers actually raise the price the more "hits&q
@classiccmp.org
Cc: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Intel C1101A
> From: Mark Moulding
> I did a bulk buy of some 1960's era miniature vacuum tubes (500 pcs)
> for around 50 cents each; the next time I looked, the price from all
> vendors who had them had ju
> From: Mark Moulding
> I did a bulk buy of some 1960's era miniature vacuum tubes (500 pcs)
> for around 50 cents each; the next time I looked, the price from all
> vendors who had them had jumped to around $3
There is another possibility (one which I think I saw happening when G
I do notice these "schlock" IC sellers actually raise the price the more "hits"
they get on an item. So your shopping around will actually make the price
worse and my even cause your earlier vendors to raise their price when you
finally do place an order.
corey cohen
uǝɥoɔ ʎǝɹoɔ
> On Dec
On 12/4/2016 3:29 PM, Brad H wrote:
The supplier (a different one from the one I first used) that quoted me on
C1101A for the second round sent me a picture.. exact same 'lot' or 'job'
number as the ones I have. So perhaps even that may not be meaningful?
What are the odds I'd hit the exact sa
alk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of dwight
Sent: Sunday, December 4, 2016 6:52 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Intel C1101A
I should note that the 1101 I have is a ceramic, non-A part as well.
I've heard the same thing, Eric. Date codes are not dates.
D
d Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Intel C1101A
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 11:30 PM, dwight wrote:
> I'm not sure I know how to decode Intel's date codes.
>
Many years ago I heard from a not-necessarily-reliable source that Intel
used lot numbers rather than date codes, so without acc
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 11:30 PM, dwight wrote:
> I'm not sure I know how to decode Intel's date codes.
>
Many years ago I heard from a not-necessarily-reliable source that Intel
used lot numbers rather than date codes, so without access to Intel
internal records, it wasn't possible to determine
On 12/3/2016 10:30 PM, dwight wrote:
I'm not sure I know how to decode Intel's date codes.
I was looking at some of the old parts I got from a friend that
was proto types from the lab.
I have a C8008-1 with F5000, a 31013 with 0587 and
a 1101 with 776.
I know the 31013 couldn't have been 1
I'm not sure I know how to decode Intel's date codes.
I was looking at some of the old parts I got from a friend that
was proto types from the lab.
I have a C8008-1 with F5000, a 31013 with 0587 and
a 1101 with 776.
I know the 31013 couldn't have been 1987 because
neither he nor I were workin
13 matches
Mail list logo
