RE: 400 Hz

2021-05-08 Thread Charles via cctalk
On 5/8/21 12:00 PM, cctalk-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote: Message: 8 Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 21:59:08 + From: W2HX To: Andrew Back , "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" Subject: RE: 400 Hz Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I will a

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-08 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 05/07/2021 06:55 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote: Hmmm. If they ever use single phase, instead of 3 phase, . . . A4 (A above middle C) is nominally 440Hz, but not everybody agrees. NY Phil uses 442, Boston uses 441, and many argue for 432. But, 400 would be A-flat. With a constant A fla

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-07 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 5/7/21 4:55 PM, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote: > Hmmm.  If they ever use single phase, instead of 3 phase, . . . > > A4 (A above middle C) is nominally 440Hz, but not everybody agrees. > NY Phil uses 442, Boston uses 441, and many argue for 432. > > But, 400 would be A-flat.  With a constant A f

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-07 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
Hmmm. If they ever use single phase, instead of 3 phase, . . . A4 (A above middle C) is nominally 440Hz, but not everybody agrees. NY Phil uses 442, Boston uses 441, and many argue for 432. But, 400 would be A-flat. With a constant A flat droning in the background, . . .

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-07 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
aircraft. 73 Eugene W2HX -Original Message- From: cctalk On Behalf Of Andrew Back via cctalk Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 11:26 AM To: cctalk@classiccmp.org Subject: Re: 400 Hz On 05/05/2021 16:07, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: Were the higher frequencies used because it directly effected

RE: 400 Hz

2021-05-07 Thread W2HX via cctalk
- From: cctalk On Behalf Of Andrew Back via cctalk Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 11:26 AM To: cctalk@classiccmp.org Subject: Re: 400 Hz On 05/05/2021 16:07, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: > Were the higher frequencies used because it directly effected the > amount of time / duration in (fra

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-07 Thread Grant Taylor via cctalk
First, thank you to everyone who replied and gave me things to think about and learn from. On 5/5/21 9:26 AM, wrco...@wrcooke.net wrote: Hope this helps. Yes, indeed, very much. Thankfully, your description happened to mesh with the weird way that my brain processes things and your message

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-06 Thread Dr. Erik Baigar via cctalk
Applying a square wave of 15kHz has harmonics up to 100kHz and more. That means, that the current in these is more than 100 times bigger - BAM! Additionally, output devices with really fast switching times can trigger reflections back from the load, and these can potentially expose these devi

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez via cctalk
Dr. Erik Baigar via cctalk wrote: I've heard that.  But why?  It's not like the electronics we're talking about actually runs on AC. (a) Input filters often contain caps... https://uk.tdk-lambda.com/content/faq/130796117766108286_FilterFAQ_how%20Image%201.jpg With 50Hz or 60Hz they create a l

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Dr. Erik Baigar via cctalk
k Note that VFDs are designed to run motors exclusively. They approximate a sine wave with pulse width modulated 400 V pulses. DON'T EVER try to run electronic gear with a VFD, at least without a massive Yes, that is what I suggested; these filters are called "Sinus Filters" in the field o

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On May 5, 2021, at 12:22 PM, Jon Elson wrote: > > On 05/05/2021 10:37 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: >> Incidentally, a way to get three phase power at a frequency of your choice >> is to use a "variable frequency drive". That's basically a high power solid >> state inverter intended to

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 05/05/2021 10:37 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: Incidentally, a way to get three phase power at a frequency of your choice is to use a "variable frequency drive". That's basically a high power solid state inverter intended to drive three-phase motors with a chosen frequency resulting in

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread erik--- via cctalk
..not to forget, that the 400Hz equipment was readily available from powering aircraft on the ground before the engines take over. So although not cheap, they where cheaper than a custom design at an arbitrary new frequency…

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Jon Elson via cctalk
On 05/05/2021 10:07 AM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: I have found the Motor Generator thread to be fascinating and enlightening. But it has made many a reference to the 400 Hz or other frequency much higher than mains line frequency. Despite the comments about the frequency, I'm still conf

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread erik--- via cctalk
> Incidentally, a way to get three phase power at a frequency of your > choice is to use a "variable frequency drive". Please be careful with this! Have quite some experience in building three phase inverters from such small boxes for my various avionics projects. (1) The normal ones rect

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 5/5/21 8:37 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > Incidentally, a way to get three phase power at a frequency of your > choice is to use a "variable frequency drive". That's basically a > high power solid state inverter intended to drive three-phase motors > with a chosen frequency resulting in

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 5/5/21 8:37 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > Incidentally, a way to get three phase power at a frequency of your choice is > to use a "variable frequency drive". That's basically a high power solid > state inverter intended to drive three-phase motors with a chosen frequency > resulting

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread erik--- via cctalk
..not to forget, that the 400Hz equipment was readily available from powering aircraft on the ground before the engines take over. So although not cheap, they where cheaper than a custom design at an arbitrary new frequency…

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On May 5, 2021, at 11:25 AM, Andrew Back via cctalk > wrote: > > On 05/05/2021 16:07, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: > >> Were the higher frequencies used because it directly effected the amount >> of time / duration in (fractions of) seconds between peaks of rectified >> (but not yet smoo

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Chuck Guzis via cctalk
On 5/5/21 8:07 AM, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: > I have found the Motor Generator thread to be fascinating and > enlightening.  But it has made many a reference to the 400 Hz or other > frequency much higher than mains line frequency.  Despite the comments > about the frequency, I'm still confus

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Andrew Back via cctalk
On 05/05/2021 16:07, Grant Taylor via cctalk wrote: > Were the higher frequencies used because it directly effected the amount > of time / duration in (fractions of) seconds between peaks of rectified > (but not yet smoothed) power? Haven't read the rest of the thread and so at the risk of being

Re: 400 Hz

2021-05-05 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
> On May 5, 2021, at 11:07 AM, Grant Taylor via cctalk > wrote: > > I have found the Motor Generator thread to be fascinating and enlightening. > But it has made many a reference to the 400 Hz or other frequency much higher > than mains line frequency. Despite the comments about the frequ