Paul Koning wrote:
>
> > On Dec 2, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Doug Jackson via cctech
> > wrote:
> >
> > Camiel,
> >
> > Without sounding super negative (my day job as a security consultant let's
> > me do that enough...) I would be especially wary of connecting anything
> > with a 10 year old stack t
> On Dec 2, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Doug Jackson via cctech
> wrote:
>
> Camiel,
>
> Without sounding super negative (my day job as a security consultant let's
> me do that enough...) I would be especially wary of connecting anything
> with a 10 year old stack to the modern internet. The range o
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 09:32:35PM -0500, Pete Rittwage via cctech wrote:
[...]
>
> You should never use one-to-one NAT like that. You should only forward the
> ports you need from the firewall to your server. In this case, I assume
> you only need tcp/23 for telnet from the outside?
Just in case
> I have a microvax set up with VMS 5, running MULTINET (and decnet
> locally). The server has a FQDN and after a while being exposed to the
> WWW someone out there started using the server as an SMTP relay. I can
> disable and clear the queue, but I'd like to block entirely this from
> happenin
Camiel,
Without sounding super negative (my day job as a security consultant let's
me do that enough...) I would be especially wary of connecting anything
with a 10 year old stack to the modern internet. The range of automatic
attacks based on what the state of the OS was when it was last patch
On 11/30/17, 9:26 PM, "cctech on behalf of william degnan via cctech"
wrote:
>
> >I have a microvax set up with VMS 5, running MULTINET (and decnet
> >locally). The server has a FQDN and after a while being exposed to the
> >WWW someone out there started using the server as an SMTP relay. I ca
On 11/30/17, 9:26 PM, "cctech on behalf of william degnan via cctech"
wrote:
>I have a microvax set up with VMS 5, running MULTINET (and decnet
>locally). The server has a FQDN and after a while being exposed to the
>WWW someone out there started using the server as an SMTP relay. I can
>disa
> >
> > The Multinet SMTP server is pretty basic and people who are serious
about
> > doing SMTP on VMS typically disable it and install a proper mailserver
like
> > PMDF. That's my excuse for not knowing how to disable SMTP relaying in
> > Multinet. That and because it probably varies for differ
Off the cuff, I'd probably stand something else up and have it relay mail
to the VAX (I suspect you've already got machines available for this
purpose, ping me off-list if not). Have the VAX only accept connections
from whatever's doing the relaying. If you can't get VMS or the smtpd to
restrict in
>
> I have a microvax set up with VMS 5, running MULTINET (and decnet
> locally). The server has a FQDN and after a while being exposed to the
> WWW someone out there started using the server as an SMTP relay. I can
> disable and clear the queue, but I'd like to block entirely this from
> happen
I have a microvax set up with VMS 5, running MULTINET (and decnet
locally). The server has a FQDN and after a while being exposed to the
WWW someone out there started using the server as an SMTP relay. I can
disable and clear the queue, but I'd like to block entirely this from
happening in the f
11 matches
Mail list logo
