Had to fire up BasiliskII to find out what kind of Fortran I used on
Mac in 1988. Turned out it was Absoft Fortran 2.4 and seemed a bit
strange as I recall M$ was written on floppies that I got for
it. Did a bit of digging on internet today and, surprisingly, Absoft
still exists and continues
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 07:50:18PM -0400, Bill Gunshannon via cctech wrote:
> Which is even funnier when you realize that the PL/M compiler
> was written in Fortran.
When all you have is a hammer ...
mcl
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 5:50 PM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On 5/31/20 2:24 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
> >
> >
> > On the other hand, Intel also had a FORTRAN-80 product, which was
> unrelated
> > to Microsoft FORTRAN-80. Intel FOTRAN-80 ran on their MDS deve
Sent from my iPhone.
> On May 31, 2020, at 9:16 PM, Bill Gunshannon
> wrote:
>
> On 5/31/20 8:35 PM, Mich.com wrote:
>> Sent from my iPhone.
On May 31, 2020, at 7:50 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/31/20 2:24 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
On the othe
On 5/31/20 8:35 PM, Mich.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone.
On May 31, 2020, at 7:50 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
wrote:
On 5/31/20 2:24 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
On the other hand, Intel also had a FORTRAN-80 product, which was unrelated
to Microsoft FORTRAN-80. Intel FOTRAN-80 ra
Sent from my iPhone.
> On May 31, 2020, at 7:50 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 5/31/20 2:24 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
>> On the other hand, Intel also had a FORTRAN-80 product, which was unrelated
>> to Microsoft FORTRAN-80. Intel FOTRAN-80 ran on their MDS developmen
On 5/31/20 2:24 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
On the other hand, Intel also had a FORTRAN-80 product, which was unrelated
to Microsoft FORTRAN-80. Intel FOTRAN-80 ran on their MDS development
systems under the ISIS-II operating system, and the compiler was written in
PL/M.
Which is even f
One reaason why you don't hear much about that is because the first
version of Microsoft Fortran for the PC wasn't real great.
It was written in Microsoft Pascal.
On Sat, 30 May 2020, John Foust via cctalk wrote:
Really!
How does this connect to Microsoft's FORTRAN-80 for CP/M circa 1977?
unr
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:27 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk
wrote:
> >> One reaason why you don't hear much about that is because the first
> >> version of Microsoft Fortran for the PC wasn't real great.
> >> It was written in Microsoft Pascal.
>
> On Sat, 30 May 2020, John Foust via cctalk wrote:
> >
One reaason why you don't hear much about that is because the first
version of Microsoft Fortran for the PC wasn't real great.
It was written in Microsoft Pascal.
On Sat, 30 May 2020, John Foust via cctalk wrote:
Really!
How does this connect to Microsoft's FORTRAN-80 for CP/M circa 1977?
un
10 matches
Mail list logo
