Re: IBM in TX

2019-01-12 Thread Pontus Pihlgren via cctalk
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:20:43AM -0800, Fritz Mueller via cctalk wrote: > I think I see an H960 with a couple DEC half panels stuck on it peeking out > of the very back there... Those are definitely H960. the front rack has a big tape drive. a quick google reveals that Atex made newspaper pu

Re: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> From: Fritz Mueller > They'd nicely compliment or house those new QSIC indicator panels > you've been working up, huh? :-) Complement. I already have a large stack of empty bezels, acquired to hold the indicator panels... :-) Although Dave Bridgham has been playing with the CNC mil

Re: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread Fritz Mueller via cctalk
> If the half panels are for sale, I'll take them! :-) They’d nicely compliment or house those new QSIC indicator panels you’ve been working up, huh? :-)

Re: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> From: Fritz Mueller > I think I see an H960 with a couple DEC half panels stuck on it peeking > out of the very back there... Two H960's, actually - it looks like there's another one in front of that one. If the half panels are for sale, I'll take them! :-) Noel

Re: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk
> On Jan 11, 2019, at 9:58 AM, William Donzelli via cctalk > wrote: > >> Looks like the "Mainframe" is an IBM Series/1 which is not a Mainframe, and >> I would say has limited appeal to collectors as there are few resources out >> there as the software is all fully licenced so its had to make

Re: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread Fritz Mueller via cctalk
I think I see an H960 with a couple DEC half panels stuck on it peeking out of the very back there...

Re: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread ED SHARPE via cctalk
thank God   for  Hoarders!   what a   stash! In a message dated 1/11/2019 10:49:45 AM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xwq1JKaMPVXLXJwhocWf9qTogANG2iye This is the pic I was sent. Original msg should have said PS/1 and PS/2. Cindy Cro

Re: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread Mark Linimon via cctalk
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:49:33AM -0600, Electronics Plus via cctalk wrote: > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xwq1JKaMPVXLXJwhocWf9qTogANG2iye That looks like a job for many, many, people. mcl

RE: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread Electronics Plus via cctalk
mp.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Katz via cctalk Sent: Friday, January 11, 2019 12:03 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: IBM in TX I spy some Sun CRTs and that ATEX cabinet looks interesting. On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 5:49 PM Electronics Plus via cctalk < cctalk@c

Re: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread Jonathan Katz via cctalk
I spy some Sun CRTs and that ATEX cabinet looks interesting. On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 5:49 PM Electronics Plus via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xwq1JKaMPVXLXJwhocWf9qTogANG2iye > > > > This is the pic I was sent. Original msg should have said PS/1 and

Re: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread William Donzelli via cctalk
> Looks like the "Mainframe" is an IBM Series/1 which is not a Mainframe, and > I would say has limited appeal to collectors as there are few resources out > there as the software is all fully licenced so its had to make legal copies. It does not help that the OS software also sucks. -- Will

RE: IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread Dave Wade via cctalk
lk On Behalf Of Electronics Plus > via cctalk > Sent: 11 January 2019 17:50 > To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts' > > Subject: IBM in TX > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xwq1JKaMPVXLXJwhocWf9qTogANG2iy > e > > > > This is t

IBM in TX

2019-01-11 Thread Electronics Plus via cctalk
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xwq1JKaMPVXLXJwhocWf9qTogANG2iye This is the pic I was sent. Original msg should have said PS/1 and PS/2. Cindy Croxton Electronics Plus --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus