>
>
> I don't think anybody is actually using real CF cards anymore, they are
> about a decade out of date.
>
>
​Well, a few of us are still using them for 8-bit hard drive emulators.
Examples include the XT-CF Lite for PC compatibles with ISA slots (which I
use), and the CFFA3000 for the Apple II.
I don't think anybody is actually using real CF cards
anymore, they are about a decade out of date.
Jon
Jon,
This is the list where we discuss using stuff that's a decade and more
out of date.
(I've got a large box of real 16MB CF cards that I got for nothing on
freecycle that I keep mean
On 03/19/2017 11:20 AM, Warner Losh via cctalk wrote:
> Just about ANY CF card you buy today new will have wear leveling.
> It's almost impossible without trying to be an ass to the card to
> have it fail in a few weeks. I've run 64MB cards in Soekris boxes for
> a decade w/o any problems. The key
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Jules Richardson via cctalk
wrote:
>
> I just bought an IDE-CF adapter the other day with the intention of
> replacing the spinning rust in my disk imaging system (which is some
> early/mid-90s 80486-based thing).
>
> However, the CF entry on Wikipedia says:
>
> "
On 03/19/2017 11:06 AM, Jules Richardson via cctalk wrote:
I just bought an IDE-CF adapter the other day with the
intention of replacing the spinning rust in my disk
imaging system (which is some early/mid-90s 80486-based
thing).
However, the CF entry on Wikipedia says:
"Most CompactFlash
I just bought an IDE-CF adapter the other day with the intention of
replacing the spinning rust in my disk imaging system (which is some
early/mid-90s 80486-based thing).
However, the CF entry on Wikipedia says:
"Most CompactFlash flash-memory devices limit wear on blocks by varying the
phy
