Re: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-18 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
Pulled the air filter on this unit. Completely plugged with brown/black junk, I can't believe much air was going through. So it's possible that the heads were in a partial vacuum and couldn't fly? Off to find a fresh RL02 filter from Amazon. :-) C On 12/18/2019 9:37 AM, Chris Zach via cctalk

Re: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-18 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
I don't believe there should be any contact to make any "wear" affect the head.  It may have been damaged if you're talking one of the heads you cleaned up.  But heads should never really contact the drive on these types of heads. Thanks Jim: The problem was happening before I removed the head

Re: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-17 Thread jim stephens via cctalk
On 12/17/2019 8:05 PM, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote: Took a look at the top of the RL02 pack. There is a fine layer of white stuff on the disk in a ring at about where I would assume track 0 is on the thing. Wipes off with my finger, but definitely was not there when I put the pack in the dri

Re: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-17 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
Took a look at the top of the RL02 pack. There is a fine layer of white stuff on the disk in a ring at about where I would assume track 0 is on the thing. Wipes off with my finger, but definitely was not there when I put the pack in the drive. Also, looking at the head under a loupe I can see

Re: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-17 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
Interesting. Ok, then there is something interesting going on: The head was clean, the pack was clean and working (haven't tried it yet in the other RL02) and yet 1 second in there was a lot of debris on the leading edge of the head. Looks like it was taking off the top of the oxide layer on th

Re: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-17 Thread Al Kossow via cctalk
On 12/16/19 7:57 PM, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote: > I'm wondering if the problem is the leading edge of the head is angled down > or something: From the debris on the leading > edge it's looking like it is digging into the pack. Not sure if this can be > adjusted, or even what adjusting the h

Re: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-16 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
December 16, 2019 3:07 PM To: CCTalk mailing list Subject: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing So one of my RL02 drives (bought on Ebay years ago) is eating RL02 packs. Makes tings, then the disks have errors in my other RL02 drive. Took a bit to figure out which drive was eating what, but I'm 100% c

Re: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-16 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
, December 16, 2019 3:07 PM To: CCTalk mailing list Subject: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing So one of my RL02 drives (bought on Ebay years ago) is eating RL02 packs. Makes tings, then the disks have errors in my other RL02 drive. Took a bit to figure out which drive was eating what, but I'm

Re: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-16 Thread dwight via cctalk
cctalk Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 3:07 PM To: CCTalk mailing list Subject: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing So one of my RL02 drives (bought on Ebay years ago) is eating RL02 packs. Makes tings, then the disks have errors in my other RL02 drive. Took a bit to figure out which drive was

Re: Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-16 Thread Guy Sotomayor Jr via cctalk
> On Dec 16, 2019, at 3:07 PM, Chris Zach via cctalk > wrote: > > So one of my RL02 drives (bought on Ebay years ago) is eating RL02 packs. > Makes tings, then the disks have errors in my other RL02 drive. Took a bit to > figure out which drive was eating what, but I'm 100% certain it's thi

Bad heads on RL02: Worth replacing

2019-12-16 Thread Chris Zach via cctalk
So one of my RL02 drives (bought on Ebay years ago) is eating RL02 packs. Makes tings, then the disks have errors in my other RL02 drive. Took a bit to figure out which drive was eating what, but I'm 100% certain it's this newer drive. So pulled the heads. The top one had significant gunk on i