I have a TT030 and actually was just looking at it last night. It has
a VME slot (as they call it) that has a dual serial port board
installed. I think it has a modem port.
That is an AppleTalk port.
Nope. My TT030 has 2 modem ports (RS232), then 2 more serial ports via VME
card. The appletalk
On 2015-10-18 11:16 AM, Stefan Skoglund (lokal användare) wrote:
lör 2015-10-17 klockan 10:01 -0400 skrev et...@757.org:
I was always under the impression that a few of them made it out
there?
I have a TT030 and actually was just looking at it last night. It has
a
VME slot (as they call it) th
sön 2015-10-18 klockan 17:16 +0200 skrev Stefan Skoglund (lokal
användare):
> The specs makes me think that it is a bit more powerfull than a Sun
> 3/80 (and 280 too.)
> The ECL monitor reminds me about Sun Sun2/3/4:era bwtwo.
>
> About the same resolution.
>
> Remark: how much did a 1280x1024 ca
lör 2015-10-17 klockan 10:01 -0400 skrev et...@757.org:
> I was always under the impression that a few of them made it out
> there?
>
> I have a TT030 and actually was just looking at it last night. It has
> a
> VME slot (as they call it) that has a dual serial port board
> installed. I
> think
ussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> >
> > Subject: Re: Atari Unix
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:26:53PM +0100, Dave G4UGM wrote:
> > > The "real SCSI" is still somewhat broken and very temperamental.
> >
> > As someone who used to mak
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Mark
> Linimon
> Sent: 17 October 2015 17:30
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>
> Subject: Re: Atari Unix
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:26:53PM +0100
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:26:53PM +0100, Dave G4UGM wrote:
> The "real SCSI" is still somewhat broken and very temperamental.
As someone who used to make a living working on VMEbus equipment ...
... if a machine has a VMEbus slot, that description usually applies.
In particular, never assume tha
-Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Liam
> Proven
> Sent: 17 October 2015 15:19
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>
> Subject: Re: Atari Unix
>
> On 17 October 2015 at 16:01, wrote:
&g
rossed wires here.
The TT shipped, sure.
It’s Atari UNIX that I /think/ did not.
--
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) • +420 702 829 053 (ČR)
On 17 October 2015 at 15:06, Dave G4UGM wrote:
> Perhaps also "too expensive"?
AIUI Atari UNIX never shipped as a product, so that’s academic; nobody
knows what they would have charged. I’m not sure about this, though.
But the “big 3” alternative home computer platforms of the 1980
Apparently efforts are underway to get this unreleased product working.
I believe it was aimed at the TT030 desktop "workstation" model of the
ST family:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari_TT030
Atari did licence UNIX™ and got a really good deal — $10 a seat!
http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/18/the-
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Liam
> Proven
> Sent: 17 October 2015 13:05
> To: Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Atari Unix
>
> Apparently efforts are underway to get this unreleased
Apparently efforts are underway to get this unreleased product working.
I believe it was aimed at the TT030 desktop "workstation" model of the
ST family:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari_TT030
Atari did licence UNIX™ and got a really good deal — $10 a seat!
http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/1
13 matches
Mail list logo
