[cctalk] Re: Fw: Re: AI applied to vintage interests

2023-01-19 Thread ben via cctalk
On 2023-01-19 3:01 p.m., Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote: I think that self-driving cars should be required to have a licensed driver with hands on the wheel at 10 and 2, or 9 and 3. On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote: 10 & 2??  What are you, old or something? Modern training spe

[cctalk] Re: Fw: Re: AI applied to vintage interests

2023-01-19 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
I think that self-driving cars should be required to have a licensed driver with hands on the wheel at 10 and 2, or 9 and 3. On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote: 10 & 2?? What are you, old or something? Modern training specifies 8 & 4 At least that's what I learned at the Ski

[cctalk] Re: Fw: Re: AI applied to vintage interests

2023-01-19 Thread Chris via cctalk
@ Fred - it just might be the requirements to get a license aren't stringent enough.

[cctalk] Re: Fw: Re: AI applied to vintage interests

2023-01-19 Thread Sellam Abraham via cctalk
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 1:20 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote: > I think that self-driving cars should be required to have a licensed > driver with hands on the wheel at 10 and 2, or 9 and 3. > 10 & 2?? What are you, old or something? Modern training specifies 8 & 4 At least that's what I learn

[cctalk] Re: Fw: Re: AI applied to vintage interests

2023-01-19 Thread Fred Cisin via cctalk
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Chris via cctalk wrote: When they prove idiots will be far less prone to hit me, I'll be for that. I'll still choose to drive myself though. If you give someone else the keys, you may wind up going somewhere you don't want to. That'a what happens when you trade your autono