On 3/30/25 6:44 PM, Martin Bishop wrote:
Your driver design sketches and comments are substantially on the money. Thank you for
making them public. However, an effective implementation in discrete components would
not be "tiny" - even with 0402 passives and a pick / place machine on the case
ridgham via cctalk [mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org]
Sent: 31 March 2025 13:02
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Cc: David Bridgham
Subject: [cctalk] Re: DEC bus transceivers
On 3/30/25 6:44 PM, Martin Bishop wrote:
> Your driver design sketches and comments are substantiall
Indeed. I think I have sixteen dZ11 boards that I could part for a unibone
On March 30, 2025 11:49:44 PM CDT, Paul Anderson via cctalk
wrote:
>Does anyone have a list of what boards they were used on?
>
>I do have some boards I'm planning or recycling (I know, I shouldn't say
>that, especially h
Does anyone have a list of what boards they were used on?
I do have some boards I'm planning or recycling (I know, I shouldn't say
that, especially here, but most are common boards nobody uses anymore.) I
haven't looked at the IPBs yet, but did plan on pulling some of the chips.
On Sun, Mar 30,
nt: 30 March 2025 22:44
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <
> cctalk@classiccmp.org>
> Cc: Martin Bishop
> Subject: [cctalk] Re: DEC bus transceivers (was: DEC Unibus variants)
>
> David
>
> You will have seen my response to shadooo / Andreas.
>
Sent: 30 March 2025 22:44
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Cc: Martin Bishop
Subject: [cctalk] Re: DEC bus transceivers (was: DEC Unibus variants)
David
You will have seen my response to shadooo / Andreas.
Occasional NOS in small quantities excepted, I'm also
David
You will have seen my response to shadooo / Andreas.
Occasional NOS in small quantities excepted, I'm also unaware of slow
transition rate drivers available for purchase. The DS8641 DS3662 DS 3682 are
to my knowledge all unobtanium.
Your driver design sketches and comments are substant
