>>> It's 8P8C with a little offset snag
>>> reminiscent of a DEC MMJ, but it's the width of an RJ-11: while an "RJ-45"
>>> Ethernet cable is too wide, a phone handset cord is the right width even
>>> though
>>> it obviously doesn't have enough connectors. I messed around with filing
>>> down
> A 'banjo' in this context is a device that breaks out the conductors of a
> modular jack to test points.
Thanks for this clarification!
>Patch cords…for banjos??
A postscript to my previous reply While 'Mean' Mary James doesn't typically
use one, Deering Banjo does have an acoustic-electric banjo:
https://www.deeringbanjos.com/products/deering-sierra-5-string-acoustic-electric-banjo
And
>Patch cords…for banjos??
A 'banjo' in this context is a device that breaks out the conductors of a
modular jack to test points. Older ones were round-ish and had a hardwired
short flat cord (usually 'silver satin' flat cable) with a modular plug on the
en
> Patch cords…for banjos??
Telco service line sets, often called buttsets or banjos.
--
personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
-- When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
Patch cords…for banjos??
>> It's 8P8C with a little offset snag
>> reminiscent of a DEC MMJ, but it's the width of an RJ-11: while an >"RJ-45"
>> Ethernet cable is too wide, a phone handset cord is the right width >even
>> though
>> it obviously doesn't have enough connectors. I messed around with >filing
>> down a
>Subject: [cctalk] 8P8C but width of an RJ-11
>It's 8P8C with a little offset snag
>reminiscent of a DEC MMJ, but it's the width of an RJ-11: while an >"RJ-45"
>Ethernet cable is too wide, a phone handset cord is the right width >even
>though
>it obviously doesn't have enough connectors. I m
Click the link.
Cant send photos here
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 12, 2024, at 23:06, mark audacity romberg via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Show us a photo.
Show us a photo.
Is it this one?
The multibutton phones like Merlin used them. Not quite rj45 not quite rj11.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/163813763385?itmmeta=01J2N97M75X5FFPCX85GNV9DNX&hash=item26240fa939:g:984AAOSwcJNapuIx&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJ4GuJK6PHgBGJcuXUB4xQ2GqRsg56CGc7F9J%2FbWBSJ9Qi0MZYsAtnKFLVSfIYaXJJYcKG5W
Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> No, they're surface contacts. It looks like Ethernet cabling and has the same
> contact spacing as RJ-45 and RJ-11, but Ethernet is too wide for the jack. I
> was wondering about RJ-45S or RJ-48, maybe.
It is my understanding that RJ-45 and RJ-48 are physically identical,
> > I'm trying to source a new I/O cable for a Convergent WorkSlate (this
> > one is grody from degenerating plasticizers). It's 8P8C with a little
> > offset snag reminiscent of a DEC MMJ, but it's the width of an RJ-11:
> > while an "RJ-45" Ethernet cable is too wide, a phone handset cord i
> I'm trying to source a new I/O cable for a Convergent WorkSlate (this
> one is grody from degenerating plasticizers). It's 8P8C with a little
> offset snag reminiscent of a DEC MMJ, but it's the width of an RJ-11:
> while an "RJ-45" Ethernet cable is too wide, a phone handset cord is
> the r
14 matches
Mail list logo
