A friend and colleage of mine says he has two TRS-80s available, or
perhaps very soon to be available, in Ottawa (the capital of Canada).
He says he knows very little about them; apparently it's been something
like a decade since they were even taken out of the boxes. For further
information, I'd
> I'm not sure about the MicroVax II but on some other VAX and Alpha
> machines, the console port may be less capable than ordinary terminal
> ports in the way of buffering, flow control, 8 bit support and so on.
The KA630, the MicroVAX-II CPU board (which includes the console serial
port), has a
>> RFC 3912 doesn't specify what output the whois server is supposed to
>> send. Everybody "assumes" that it should be the complete domain
>> information, but that's simply not the case.
>> Imposing this assumption is what Mouse does, and that is wrong.
No, that is not what I'm doing, though I c
> I'm also a Cube owner in Toronto. Maybe we should start a local
> collector's / user's group :D
> Any others care to speak up?
I'm in Ottawa. I've got a - very small! - collection of NeXT hardware.
A slab or two, at least one megapixel display (the 2bpp greyscale
kind), some small number of k
>> And BTW, what you are doing is not clever at all:
>> mo...@rodents-montreal.org
>> SMTP error from remote mail server after initial connection:
>> host MX-4.rodents-montreal.org [98.124.61.89]:
>> 550-.de's whois server, whois.denic.de, is completely broken, handing
>> 550-out
> You know how to see what user agent I use (hint: alpine). And it is
> fully capable of editing or changing anything I want.
Good. Then what's the problem?
Do you just want the list to be tuned so that you won't have to take a
few seconds to edit out any addresses you don't want to send to?
Ba
> My complaint (and I guess many more from other users will follow) is,
> that if you reply to a message on the list, the author of that
> message gets a private mail, too, as he is listed in the
> Reply-To:-field.
Only if you don't bother editing it down to whichever address you want
to reply to
> Hi, all, I have a Heathkit TC-3 tube checker, including manual and
> prints, available. Image here:
> http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/jpg/tmp/TubeChecker.jpg
Oh, man, that takes me back. As a kid, back when electronics meant
vacuum tubes (because that was what I had access to), I had a
(
>> [From: changing]
> You can blame me for the change to the way the From: header is
> handled. The purpose of this change is to try to solve the mass
> bounce problem.
Sounds as though this may be a cure worse than the disease, though.
> Actually, you should really blame the folks responsible
