The fact I don’t think it is necessary for a Lego set specifically endorsing
the role of women in computing is unpleasant or mean spirited?
Get a life Liam. I simply expressed my view.
Are we really at a state on this list where when someone posts mentioning
something, that anyone who expresses
en who do work in IT.
-Original Message-
From: cctalk On Behalf Of Toby Thain via cctalk
Sent: 04 December 2021 22:24
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Women of Computing
On 2021-12-04 2:55 p.m., Chris Long via cctalk wrote:
> On the contrary I conside
the field of computer history.”
— Brie
> On Dec 4, 2021, at 12:43 PM, Jason Howe via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> I'm curious what your definition of 'woke' is, because it seems grossly
> misapplied in this instance.
>
> --Jason
>
>
>> On 12/4/21 10:2
Great.not.
Why do we need woke Lego?
-Original Message-
From: cctalk On Behalf Of Zane Healy via cctalk
Sent: 03 December 2021 17:35
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Women of Computing
I really want to see this set produced, especially for the “Ada Love
You might find reading this thread useful:
https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=57843
-Original Message-
From: cctalk On Behalf Of Jules Richardson
via cctalk
Sent: 06 September 2020 21:28
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: CGA card (Mitsubishi Electric) wit
I actually thought the spam most was better than some of the usual postings
on here!
-Original Message-
From: cctalk On Behalf Of Peter Coghlan via
cctalk
Sent: 01 September 2020 09:01
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Spam
Paul Koning wrote:
> > On Aug 3
This is tedious.
-Original Message-
From: cctalk On Behalf Of Dennis Boone via
cctalk
Sent: 05 July 2019 22:29
To: Grant Taylor ; General Discussion:
On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Email delivery protocols / methods.
> · FidoNet (FTN)
As long as we're being silly, this i
