Sellam Abraham wrote
> Can this stop already?
I am with Sellam on this. The content of these messages reflects virtually
nothing relating to classic computers except perhaps in very limited ways, such
as Eliza and classic expert systems.
The "scientific" commentary needs to end. Please.
-
>
> > Will the circle be unbroken?
> >
> > (Except that some people maintain it's a square)
> I pick 3, the Reuleaux.
> Ben.
>
Other shapes go boing, boing, boing, boing.
Reuleaux triangle goes Hmm.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHzeGEHWMjo
On 2025-01-26 12:11 p.m., Joseph S. Barrera III via cctalk wrote:
On 1/25/2025 5:55 AM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
Can this stop already?
Will the circle be unbroken?
(Except that some people maintain it's a square)
I pick 3, the Reuleaux.
Ben.
PS: Less fiction with this topic, than wi
On 1/25/2025 5:55 AM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
Can this stop already?
Will the circle be unbroken?
(Except that some people maintain it's a square)
UNSBUSCBRIE
^C^C^C^\^C:q!^Z^G^G
On 1/25/2025 5:55 AM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk wrote:
Can this stop already?
Sellam
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 9:33 PM Frank Leonhardt via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
On 23/01/2025 23:00, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote:
On Jan 23, 2025, at 5:37 PM, Robe
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:12:17AM +, donald donaldwhittemore.com via
cctalk wrote:
> I don’t trip and fall. I perform gravity checks.
And isn't it reassuring to notice that nobody has turned off the gravity
by accident?
SCNR,
Alex.
--
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is
