[cctalk] Re: Mail veracity signing

2023-04-20 Thread Tom Hunter via cctalk
It got all the way Down Under. 8-) On Fri, 21 Apr 2023, 8:56 am Zane Healy via cctalk, wrote: > That was rather my thought, it made it through. > > Zane > > > > > > On Apr 20, 2023, at 5:38 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk < > cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > > Your note got through, that's a pro

[cctalk] Re: Mail veracity signing

2023-04-20 Thread Zane Healy via cctalk
That was rather my thought, it made it through. Zane > On Apr 20, 2023, at 5:38 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk > wrote: > > Your note got through, that's a promising start. Let's hope this change > helps. > > paul > >> On Apr 20, 2023, at 8:32 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk >> wrote: >

[cctalk] Re: Mail veracity signing

2023-04-20 Thread Paul Koning via cctalk
Your note got through, that's a promising start. Let's hope this change helps. paul > On Apr 20, 2023, at 8:32 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk > wrote: > > Folks, > > A heads up that I've turned on some mail veracity signing functionality > in Mailman. One could hope it would just work,

[cctalk] Mail veracity signing

2023-04-20 Thread Dennis Boone via cctalk
Folks, A heads up that I've turned on some mail veracity signing functionality in Mailman. One could hope it would just work, and that I made no mistakes in the configuration, but... :) I'm working on this to try to improve deliverability of list traffic. De