On 9/24/20 12:15 PM, Jules Richardson via cctech wrote:
the Linux kernel at least has depended on it for a very long time
Do you have any idea how far back one might need to go to get a kernel
that didn't depend on SCSI Inquiry?
I wonder if a retro computer with a really old kernel and a SCS
On 9/23/20 3:28 PM, Michael Engel via cctech wrote:
It seems that the problem lies in the firmware of the ACB4000, which
doesn´t seem to support some standard commands, e.g. the INQUIRY command.
Most recent Linux SCSI drivers seem to use this command.
Lack of Inquiry support seems to be quite
Apologies if this is easily found info but is there a good guide on getting
into the tadpole systems? I recall my last time felt futile and I read some
warnings from folks smarter than me suggesting its easy to break but not
properly disassemble.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020, 1:45 PM null via cctalk wrot
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:57 AM John Foust via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>
> Mine stopped working a decade or so ago. I have a dozen or so,
> but none are powering up any more.
>
> I seem to remember someone here who'd revived one. Did it mean
> replacing sockets, replacing caps?
>
Mine stopped working a decade or so ago. I have a dozen or so,
but none are powering up any more.
I seem to remember someone here who'd revived one. Did it mean
replacing sockets, replacing caps?
- John
Hi,
I remember I used Linux with an AdvanSys PCI adapter to successfully read a disk
connected through an ACB4000. It's been a while but I believe I had to run
an old kernel which I compiled myself with support for ACB4000. Might have
been that a patch was applied.
All I found in my archives is a
On 09/24/20 18:00, cctech-requ...@classiccmp.org wrote:
Disabling SCSI parity checking to dump disk on ACB4000
MFM-SCSI adapter?
I have a sun 3 system with acb4000 and suspect the protocol
was not fully sorted in that time frame. They can be fussy
about what they will talk to, ime.
Wou
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 6:21 PM, Camiel Vanderhoeven via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 24, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/24/20 1:12 AM, Camiel Vanderhoeven via cctalk wrote:
>>> I used an Ancot Ultra2080/Lite SCSI-bus Analyzer. This is a device that
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Grant Taylor via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 9/24/20 1:12 AM, Camiel Vanderhoeven via cctalk wrote:
>> I used an Ancot Ultra2080/Lite SCSI-bus Analyzer. This is a device that
>> connects to a SCSI bus and has a serial port. Over the serial port, you can
>> monito
On 9/24/20 1:12 AM, Camiel Vanderhoeven via cctalk wrote:
I used an Ancot Ultra2080/Lite SCSI-bus Analyzer. This is a device
that connects to a SCSI bus and has a serial port. Over the serial
port, you can monitor the signals on the SCSI bus, and use it as a
SCSI protocol analyzer. There’s also
> On Sep 23, 2020, at 10:28 PM, Michael Engel via cctech
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/23/20 8:54 PM, Grant Taylor via cctech wrote:
>> On 9/23/20 12:51 PM, Michael Engel via cctech wrote:
>>> Do you know if is there another OS which would make it easier to change
>>> crucial SCSI parameters in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
