> Given the little literature I've seen on the subject, and also the
> amount of real-time control computers that I've seen in labs being
> dismantled... I'd say that it was probably a late IBM response to PDP-11
> and HP 21xx and 1xxx process control computers.
That would be correct - and is even
ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
Was IBM Series/1 for process control?Ed#
writes:In a message dated 8/2/2019 6:18:22 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk@classiccmp.org
On 08/02/2019 02:40 PM, Kevin Bowling via cctalk wrote:
Anyone have one of these? I'd like to find a system, but images of
the OS
Was IBM Series/1 for process control?Ed#
writes:In a message dated 8/2/2019 6:18:22 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
cctalk@classiccmp.org
On 08/02/2019 02:40 PM, Kevin Bowling via cctalk wrote:
> Anyone have one of these? I'd like to find a system, but images of
> the OS media would be interesting
I have a pair, plus parts.
The hardware is excellent. They have fairly fast processors, and the
I/O capacity is great. Reliability is typical IBM.
The OS sucks balls. All the balls.
Commercially, they were not a success, despite being IBM's first
"open" system, in that they invited third party d
On 08/02/2019 02:40 PM, Kevin Bowling via cctalk wrote:
Anyone have one of these? I'd like to find a system, but images of
the OS media would be interesting.
I have some bits of several Series/1 systems, but no
complete system at all.
Jon
> On August 2, 2019 at 5:49 PM ben via cctalk wrote:
>
>
> On 8/2/2019 11:15 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
> > 1993 article on building a multiprocessor 6809 box.
> >
> > http://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/6809cpu.htm
>
> Read that page years ago.I have always like the 6800 CPU
> model.
On 8/2/2019 11:15 AM, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
1993 article on building a multiprocessor 6809 box.
http://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/6809cpu.htm
Read that page years ago.I have always like the 6800 CPU
model.I have used that model for a 18 and 20 bit cpu design
currently being bread boa
I have what appears to be a nice one…I just haven’t had time to do anything
with it yet.
It does have 2 discs (I think one is 40MB and the other is 300MB). There is a
big label on the system that says “DEV’T TOOLS”
so I’m hopeful that there’s some interesting SW on it.
TTFN - Guy
> On Aug 2,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 4:19 PM Fred Cisin via cctalk
wrote:
> >> our legendary VCF consignment sale,
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, Ali via cctalk wrote:
> > Maybe at the other meets (e.g. MW or Pacific NW) but the last few times
> not so much at VCFW. Last year I bought some stuff because Fred
> specific
Anyone have one of these? I'd like to find a system, but images of
the OS media would be interesting.
Regards,
Kevin
Good question. There are upgrades up to 4mb, but ones for the 800 most
common range from 64k to 1088k. A pair of really common and several
less common standards have existed for many years. This one conforms
to the Axlon standard, which is among the oldest for the Atari's. It
switches the bank
I'm building as many as ten of a 512k Axlon compatible memory board for
the Atari 800 (not xl) computer. If you'd like to have one, please
message me and let me know so I can reserve one for you.
I'm not sure of my cost at the moment, but it is something on the order
of $30.00 per board. I'll to
1993 article on building a multiprocessor 6809 box.
http://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/6809cpu.htm
--
Liam Proven - Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk - Google Mail/Hangouts/Plus: lpro...@gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven - Skype/LinkedIn: liamproven
UK: +44
13 matches
Mail list logo
