It might be worth trying to talk to the IBM Museum at Hursley.
https://slx-online.biz/hursley/contact_us.asp
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk On Behalf Of Guy Dunphy via
> cctalk
> Sent: 23 July 2019 04:28
> To: Mattis Lind ; General Discussion: On-Topic and
> Off-Topic Posts
>
At 07:16 PM 22/07/2019 +0200, Mattis Lind wrote:
>> BTW. I have three IBM 026 card punch machines as a future restoration
>> project. But can I find
>> a service manual? No. None online, only one for the later 028. And even if
>> there was a PDF
>Have you seen these:
>http://www.bitsavers.org/pd
> On Jul 21, 2019, at 6:20 PM, Jon Elson via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> On 07/21/2019 04:48 PM, ben via cctalk wrote:
>> It is not the DPI that is problem on some scans, but they used
>> a LOSSY format to store the data. JPEG IS NO!
> Yes, ABSOLUTELY! JPEG is designed for things that have smooth to
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019, 12:43 Warner Losh via cctalk
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:09 AM geneb via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
> >
> > > So for the moment, I have to keep all my scans local (but accessible).
> > >
> > No you don't. Uploading t
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:09 AM geneb via cctalk
wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
>
> > So for the moment, I have to keep all my scans local (but accessible).
> >
> No you don't. Uploading to archive.org is painless and easy.
>
Maybe I'll try both :)
Warner
> >> BTW. I have three IBM 026 card punch machines as a future restoration
> project. But can I find
> >> a service manual? No. None online, only one for the later 028. And even
> if there was a PDF
Have you seen these:
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/punchedCard/Keypunch/A24-
0520-2_24-26_Keyp
On 07/22/2019 10:55 AM, Guy Dunphy via cctalk wrote:
> At 10:41 AM 21/07/2019 -0600, you wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 4:16 AM Joseph S. Barrera III via cctalk
> wrote:
>> I'd suggest that in 2019 when bits are cheap and high-quality scanners
>> nearly as cheap, "crappy quality digital image" is
At 10:41 AM 21/07/2019 -0600, you wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019, 4:16 AM Joseph S. Barrera III via cctalk
wrote:
>I'd suggest that in 2019 when bits are cheap and high-quality scanners
>nearly as cheap, "crappy quality digital image" is a bit of a straw man.
>Yes, I've seen plenty of barely-readabl
At 12:48 AM 22/07/2019 -0600, you wrote:
>On 7/21/2019 8:07 PM, Guy Dunphy via cctalk wrote:
>
>> BTW. I have three IBM 026 card punch machines as a future restoration
>> project. But can I find
>> a service manual? No. None online, only one for the later 028. And even if
>> there was a PDF
>> I
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
So for the moment, I have to keep all my scans local (but accessible).
No you don't. Uploading to archive.org is painless and easy.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cock
> On Jul 21, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Joseph S. Barrera III via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> I'd suggest that in 2019 when bits are cheap and high-quality scanners
> nearly as cheap, "crappy quality digital image" is a bit of a straw man.
> Yes, I've seen plenty of barely-readable or practically unreadable s
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:27 AM Guy Dunphy via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> At 07:58 PM 21/07/2019 -0700, you wrote:
> >> Even if the digital version _did_ fully capture the information
> content, I
> >> strongly dispute that the physical item/document has lost it's value.
> >> That '
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019, 1:28 AM Christian Corti via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, Warner Losh wrote:
> > I just scanned my Rainbow 100 User's Manual at 300, 600 and 1200dpi using
> > the scansnap default settings. You see a jump between 300 and 600, but
> > little dif
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:23 AM Christian Corti via cctalk
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, Guy Dunphy wrote:
> > http://www.bitsavers.org/bitkeepers is something else.
> > The site's contact email is right down the bottom of the front page.
> > Visual, to stop spambots.
> > Also Al posts here
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 5:21 AM ED SHARPE wrote:
>
> Great to know Tony! Yea the battery is dead indeed! Will the wallwart
> power it even though the battery is dead? Wish I could remember where
> I put the wall warts... missing are the one for a 16 line portable, a
> disc
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, it was written
Just give him time, he is only human after all ;-)
I know :-)
I think I should wait some more years (I found a mail from Feb. 2016, the
last was from Aug. 2018) ;-))
Christian
On 2019-07-22 09:23, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, Guy Dunphy wrote:
>> http://www.bitsavers.org/ bitkeepers is something else.
>> The site's contact email is right down the bottom of the front page.
>> Visual, to stop spambots.
>> Also Al posts here in cctalk.
>
> Sp
While Al is working through his backlog, the HP Computer Museum would be
happy to put them up in the appropriate device webpages. They would be
a great addition to a site that focuses on vintage HP computing equipment!
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 17:23, Christian Corti via cctalk <
cctalk@classicc
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, Warner Losh wrote:
I just scanned my Rainbow 100 User's Manual at 300, 600 and 1200dpi using
the scansnap default settings. You see a jump between 300 and 600, but
little difference going on up to 1200 for this material. I posted the
That tells me that you need to scan at l
On Sun, 21 Jul 2019, Guy Dunphy wrote:
http://www.bitsavers.org/bitkeepers is something else.
The site's contact email is right down the bottom of the front page. Visual, to
stop spambots.
Also Al posts here in cctalk.
Speaking of this, I suggest to rethink the method of submitting scans t
20 matches
Mail list logo
