> On Jan 7, 2019, at 10:02 PM, Fritz Mueller wrote:
>
>> On Jan 7, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
>> wrote:
>>
>> Well, there are single-RK05 images up already:
>>
>> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/PDP-11/Distributions/research/Ken_Wellsch_v6/
>
> ...which directory contains sever
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Well, there are single-RK05 images up already:
>
> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/PDP-11/Distributions/research/Ken_Wellsch_v6/
Hmm, this link didn’t work for me; I found I think equivalent mirrored at:
https://www.tuhs.o
On 01/07/2019 07:51 PM, allison via cctalk wrote:
I still want to make a stretched 8, PDP8 ISA with 16 bits
and faster. No good reason save for it wold be fun.
Umm, I think that is called a Data General Nova!
Jon
On 01/07/2019 07:25 PM, ben via cctalk wrote:
> On 1/7/2019 8:20 AM, allison via cctalk wrote:
> snip...
>> made though more likely 74F, AS, or LS variant and of course CMOS 74ACT
>> (and cmos friends) as I just bought a bunch. Dip is getting harder to
>> get but
>> the various SMT packages are ea
On 1/7/2019 8:20 AM, allison via cctalk wrote:
snip...
made though more likely 74F, AS, or LS variant and of course CMOS 74ACT
(and cmos friends) as I just bought a bunch. Dip is getting harder to
get but
the various SMT packages are easy. Prices for 10 or more of a part are
cheap to cheaper fr
> From: Fritz Mueller
> Thanks, Noel -- I'll give that a try!
Sure - always glad to help with anything V6 related - that's my chief
technical amusement, now that I'm retired! :-) Any questions/issues, let me
know, and I'll try and get right back.
When booting UNIX, remember make sure th
I wonder if there were ever any TWAIN drivers for Win 3.x.
Yes, but I think that you needed WIN32S installed.
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019, Liam Proven wrote:
Ah, could be.
16-bit TWAIN was supported in version 1.9 of the specification, apparently
eliminated by 2.2
Other than a 16 bit version
> I guess I'll do up a cheat sheet.
OK, first crack here:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/Upgrading_UNIX_Sixth_Edition
If there are any improvement I can/should make, please let me know.
Thanks!
Noel
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 22:11, Fred Cisin via cctalk
wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 02:39, Ali via cctalk wrote:
> >> I wonder if there were ever any TWAIN drivers for Win 3.x.
>
> Yes, but I think that you needed WIN32S installed.
Ah, could be.
> But few pay any attention to any techno
no only hp scan jets no other brands and only the first few models. thanks
though.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
On Monday, January 7, 2019 Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
> my foggy brain remembers them as I retied the biz end of
> things bef
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> ...there are single-RK05 images up already:
>
> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/PDP-11/Distributions/research/Ken_Wellsch_v6/
>
> but they only include binary for /40’s ... but really, it's drop-dead simple
> to build a /45 ve
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, ED SHARPE via cctalk wrote:
my foggy brain remembers them as I retied the biz end of
things before win 95 came out.
About 1992.
After Windoze 3.00 (I got "beta" Windoze 3.10 in August 1991, public
release soon after?), and about the time of 3.11
I have a cou
my foggy brain remembers them as I retied the biz end of things before
win 95 came out.
and I seem to remember twain as a term used with hp scanjets before
retirement.\
when i left scanjet 2c was current color product.]anyone coming thou
az with a scanjet iic
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 02:39, Ali via cctalk wrote:
I wonder if there were ever any TWAIN drivers for Win 3.x.
Yes, but I think that you needed WIN32S installed.
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, Liam Proven via cctalk wrote:
This is stretching my powers of recollection -- and in my world, back
then
> From: Fritz Mueller
> I've thought about that; Unix V6 is actually next on my list of OS's to
> try. I think I have seen a fairly detailed set of instructions on
> building an image from this from the commonly available distribution
> tape.
Yeah, one comes with the V6 distr
Few people (but most are right here) can recite PI to enough digits to
reach the level of inaccuracy. And those who believe that PI is exactly
22/7 are unaffected by FDIV. (YES, some schools do still teach that!)
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, Johnny Eriksson via cctalk wrote:
Why remember the digits,
Hi Paul,
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>> On Jan 6, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>>
>> I'd have to refresh my memory on how but it's clearly possible to force a
>> crash dump. That would allow us to dig into exactly what went wrong,
>> provided you can read the
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 6:29 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Try running your RSTS image on Ersatz-11, see if it's a simulator issue.
I’ll give that a go.
> And try bringing up Unix V6 on your machine ... I can help with providing the
> image, if needed.
I’ve thought about that; Unix
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 10:40 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> ...
> 5. You should now have the crash dump in [0,1]CRASH.SYS, so you can either
> extract that file and the OS image (the RSTS "SIL" file), or the whole disk.
> To analyze it, you can use the standard utility ANALYS, or th
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 04:51, Eric Christopherson via cctalk
wrote:
>
> OK, so it's down *to* the bunker or down *in* the bunker. I'm just asking
> because of my language geekery. I still don't know, though, whether "down
> the bunker" without a preposition is idiomatic in some dialect of English
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 02:59, Zane Healy via cctalk
wrote:
>
> Websites are a huge inconvenience or imposition, email lists are not.
Agreed.
However, for a lot of younger people and those to whom "email" just
means "MS Outlook", it's hard work. They do not understand
complexities such as filteri
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 02:39, Ali via cctalk wrote:
> I wonder if there were ever any TWAIN drivers for Win 3.x.
This is stretching my powers of recollection -- and in my world, back
then, if you could afford (and wanted) a scanner, you used a Mac --
but I think so, yes.
We are all aware o
On 01/06/2019 11:24 PM, Dave Wade via cctalk wrote:
I am also pretty sure that prior to S/360 the term
"character" was generally used for non 8-bit character
machines. I am not familiar with the IBM 70xx series machines
The IBM 7070 (business machine) was a word-addressed
machine, but all dec
> On Jan 6, 2019, at 9:34 PM, Fritz Mueller via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
>> On Jan 6, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
>>
>> Hm. Can you read data back from the RK05 pack? I'd have to refresh my
>> memory on how but it's clearly possible to force a crash dump. That would
>>
On 01/07/2019 09:51 AM, Peter Corlett via cctalk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 02:54:08PM -0700, ben via cctalk wrote:
>> On 1/6/2019 12:24 PM, allison via cctalk wrote:
>>> The small beauty of being there... FYI back then (1972) a 7400 was about
>>> 25 cents and 7483 adder was maybe $1.25. L
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:51 AM Peter Corlett via cctalk <
cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Thanks to inflation, $0.25 in 1972 is worth $1.51 now. Likewise, $1.25 has
> inflated to $7.54. So they're cheaper in real terms than they used to be.
>
> However, it's still not entirely comparable, as I sus
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 02:54:08PM -0700, ben via cctalk wrote:
> On 1/6/2019 12:24 PM, allison via cctalk wrote:
>> The small beauty of being there... FYI back then (1972) a 7400 was about
>> 25 cents and 7483 adder was maybe $1.25. Least that's what I paid.
> Checks my favorite supplier.
> $1.
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 12:24 AM, Dave Wade via cctalk
> wrote:
>
> ...
> I am also pretty sure that prior to S/360 the term "character" was generally
> used for non 8-bit character machines. I am not familiar with the IBM 70xx
> series machines but certainly on the 1401 and 1620 the term byte
> From: Fritz Mueller
> Oh, one last thing: if anybody else out there has a real working '11/45
> + RK05 and wants to try this RSTS image, let me know, and I'll send you
> a copy (all 2.5MB of it, hah). It'd be interesting to see if this a
> really just limited to my machine?
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 3:20 AM, Johnny Eriksson via cctalk
> wrote:
>
>> Few people (but most are right here) can recite PI to enough digits to
>> reach the level of inaccuracy. And those who believe that PI is exactly
>> 22/7 are unaffected by FDIV. (YES, some schools do still teach that
> From: Dave Wade
> The only machine I know where a "byte" is not eight bits is the
> Honeywell L6000 and its siblings
I'm not sure why I bother to post to this list, since apparently people don't
bother to read my messages.
>From the "pdp10 reference handbook", 1970, section 2.3, "B
31 matches
Mail list logo
