The quality of glass and thickness may be a problem with the hematocrit caps
but definitely worth a try in a pinch. - todd
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Prince, D Bryan
[dbryan.pri...@astrazeneca.com]
Sent: Monday, July 07
Hello All-
I am interested in monomer/dimer contamination when building a crystal lattice,
ie. if you are building a crystal lattice with a monomeric species of protein,
incorporation of dimers may yield lattice or surface defects. This species may
be considered a macromolecular contaminant. I
I agree here. The 50 % could be a good indicator.
I am finishing a new structure which was about 42% twinned in the monoclinic
setting (b = ~90) for an Se-Met dataset. When I went to refine it with the
native dataset, the twin fraction increased to 50%, figured something wasn't
right. fortunate
Hello All-
I have recently determined a domain structure of a larger protein. The
structure shows a clear disulfide bond between two monomers in the asymmetric
unit. I'm trying to figure out if this is an artifact of the crystal packing or
has biological relevance. The protein has been reported
I'll second Jim on this. Just this week, I set up my linux box with the nvidia
3d vision 2 kit which I use with the ASUS VG278HE. My graphics card is the
quadro K4000 and the only pitfall was that I had to purchase the 3 pin
connector to get it to sync:
http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/PNY-full
My guess is they had the best data they could get, did molecular replacement
with the two halves of the repressor and the dna, got a solution and didn't use
appropriate restraints in the refinement. Like Phoebe mentioned, we have better
tools for this these days.
__
wrote:
The abstract of the papers says they used MIR.
Mark J van Raaij
Dpto de Estructura de Macromoleculas
Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia - CSIC
c/Darwin 3
E-28049 Madrid, Spain
tel. (+34) 91 585 4616
http://www.cnb.csic.es/~mjvanraaij
>
>
>
>
>
> On 23 Apr 2015, at 18:
I think if you chose option "entering reflection transformation" from the
define transformation matrix button under reindexing details and then use:
h->k, k->l, l->h
i think you should be ok.
-Todd
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of
If you change it in the def.site file, when you start HKL2000 and select the
detector type, it has to be the one with the name of the directory of the
def.site file that you corrected. If it doesn't have the values that you
entered into the def.site file then you are either not choosing the corr
I never would have survived the dress code back then.
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of Anastassis
Perrakis [a.perra...@nki.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:27 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] first use
10 matches
Mail list logo