Hi All,
Many thanks for your reply.
I am quite sure that my crystals are the complex. I made the complex by 1:1.1
ratio with the small component excess, then did the methylation, followed by
gel filtration to remove the small reductant. The SDS-PAGEs for gel filtration
fractions and crystals
A few things to try (or double-check):
1. If you ran phaser with SGALTERNATIVE ALL, make sure the mtz file you
gave to refmac has the same screw axes as the MR solution. If this is
off, it'll lead to higher R-factors.
2. As Fred mentioned, try with a single copy of the protein, and check
th
Hello All,
We are trying to refine ARG residues with two conformations in Refmac5, and the
refined atom positions in the output PDB file are all over the place, as if the
geometry restraints are not well defined.
We've tried several different formats for the input file, based on previous
postings
Could you please try the version from York:
www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/refmac/latest_refmac.html
I think probkem you mention is related with compilation or something.
At least I cannot repat it on my computer
regards
Garib
On 25 Nov 2009, at 16:18, John Pascal wrote:
Hello All,
We are trying to
I would also try Open-EPMR as well as Phaser. It
can sometimes find solutions that Phaser or Amore cannot, especially
for multiple chains and low resolution. EPMR is especially good at
handling high copy numbers of search models.
Cheers.
Pete Meyer wrote:
A few
things to try (or double-check
also try MOLREP (CCP4i) - we had a case where AMORE and PHASER did not
work (in our hands), but MOLREP did, using the internal MOLREP
sequence alignment/unequal amino acid trimming feature.
This was a case of a P1 cell with 12 copies of the same molecule, 2.3A
resolution, not very high-qualit
To complicate things some more, a couple of things could be going on.
1. You could have pseudosymmetry, where you true SG is I4 and the
additional NCS operators make the crystal look I422.
2. You could have twinning. If merohedral, could be I4. If
pseudomerohedral, could be any of the subgrou
Actually, another thing could be going on as well. You show a large
off-origin peak in the Patterson in I422 so you may have
pseudotranslation going on and you processed in the supercell. You could
probably try to reindex choosing fewer spots and get your P422 cell. I
am sure there is some law
Thank you all for your informative responses!
While examining the effects of unusual beam profiles on data
collection due to capillary optics, I had collected a wedge of data
on a large, high-quality lysozyme crystal at 8 different sample to
detector distances. I restricted the analysis of
Richard Gillilan wrote:
I like Jim Plufgrath's way of looking at the problem: reflections and
background scatter have different effective source sizes and
distances. For a reflection, the source is the same as the beamline
source (some place way upstream). For solvent the source is the sample
Thanks for your replies!
Does anyone know where to find free open_EPMR software? It seems that
website is no longer reachable.
Chao
On Wednesday 25 November 2009 13:56:38 Chao Quan wrote:
> Thanks for your replies!
>
> Does anyone know where to find free open_EPMR software? It seems that
> website is no longer reachable.
The web site looks perfectly normal from here:
http://www.epmr.info/
--
Ethan A Merritt
Biom
Dear CCP4 community:
I am trying to solve a structure using Molecular Replacement. We obtained
several crystal
forms of the same molecule, which is a hetero-trimer(18KD+16kD+15kD). We have
solved the structure of one crystal form(form_1), which has space group P 42
22, 1
molecule per Asymmetr
Dear all,
Sorry for the off-topic question, but I am really curious why two
terminal residues could make such huge difference.
I am working on a all helical domain starting from residue 1 to about
130. It expressed well with N-terminal His tag in both E.Coli and
insect cell, but stayed in
Dear Tiancen,
This is perhaps a more extreme example of what many of us have experienced
over and over - namely that for some proteins very small changes make a huge
difference in expression, solubility, activity or all three :)
Long and rambling reply follows - don't read if you are easily bored
15 matches
Mail list logo