Re: [ccp4bb] Extra density on Cysteine

2024-06-21 Thread Mark J. van Raaij
Dear Tina, my guess would be minor oxidation of the cysteine. The green positive difference density suggests a bound atom in three different positions; this could however just be the first atom of something bigger like beta-mercaptoethanol, with the rest of that molecule too disordered to see.

Re: [ccp4bb] extra density on Cysteine

2007-08-14 Thread Stephen Graham
2cystein.jpeg looks just like oxidation of cysteine to S-hydroxy-cysteine (a.k.a. cysteine sulfenic acid). I have seen this repeatedly in one of my structures (E. coli aminopeptidase P, see 1WL9 for an example). We discuss this a bit in Graham et al (2005) Biochemistry 44: 13820-36 - see Figure 2

Re: [ccp4bb] extra density on Cysteine

2007-08-14 Thread mesters
Rather difficult to decide. It depends on whether BME was present during all protein purification steps. Also, BME is somewhat short lived. You have to add new BME every few days or so. At least one looks like it could be oxidized, a process that cannot be reversed by BME J. Artem Evdoki

Re: [ccp4bb] extra density on Cysteine

2007-08-13 Thread Artem Evdokimov
Hi, They're likely both BME adducts, just in the first case the CH2CH2OH portion is way more disordered. Artem _ From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 9:59 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb]