comparisons would be
confounded by variabities in multiplicity and a hundred other things, so come
on, developers, just comment it out!
JPK
-Original Message-
From: graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>
[mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tue
icity and a hundred other things, so come on,
developers, just comment it out!
JPK
-Original Message-----
From:
graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>
[mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob
mailto:
---
From:
graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>
[mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob
mailto:kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>>
Cc: ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk<mailto:ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Rmer
icity and a hundred other things, so come on,
developers, just comment it out!
JPK
-Original Message-----
From:
graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>
[mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob
mailto:kell...
cal reasons or comparisons to previous datasets, but
anyway those comparisons would be confounded by variabities in
multiplicity and a hundred other things, so come on, developers,
just comment it out!
JPK
-Original Message-
From:
graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac
out!
JPK
-Original Message-
From:
graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>
[mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob
mailto:kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>>
Cc: ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk<mailto:ccp4bb@jisc
variabities in multiplicity and a hundred other things, so come
on, developers, just comment it out!
JPK
-Original Message-
From: graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>
[mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob ma
and suspect perhaps the Rmeas folks can/will answer
better than I.
All the best,
Jacob
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Frank von
Delft
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 2:26 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Rmergicide Through Programming
Okay, that
> If the statistics you want to use are there & some others also, what is
>>>> the pressure to remove them? Surely we want to educate on how best to
>>>> interpret the entire table above to get a fuller picture of the overall
>>>> quality of the
d.ac.uk>
[mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob
mailto:kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>>
Cc: ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk<mailto:ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Rmergicide Through Programming
HI Jacob
Unbiased estimate of the
s in multiplicity and a hundred other things, so come
on, developers, just comment it out!
JPK
-Original Message-
From: graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>
[mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob mailto:kell
hich is becoming even more of a problem with data sets
>> of increasing variability in multiplicity. Consider the case of comparing a
>> data set with a multiplicity of 2 versus one of 100: equivalent data quality
>> would yield Rmerges diverging by a factor of ~1.4. But this has al
t comment it out!
JPK
-Original Message-
From: graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>
[mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob mailto:kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>>
Cc: ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk<mailto:ccp4bb@jiscm
, developers, just comment it out!
JPK
-Original Message-
From: graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk
<mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk>
[mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob <mailto:kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>>
Cc: ccp4bb@jiscm
>I do not see what harm there is reporting Rmerge, even if it is just used in
>the inner shell or just used to capture a flavour of the data set overall. I
>also appreciate that Rmeas converges to the same value for large multiplicity
Consider a callow young grad student, David, who being beleag
us datasets, but anyway those comparisons would be
>> confounded by variabities in multiplicity and a hundred other things, so
>> come on, developers, just comment it out!
>>
>> JPK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From:
rom: graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk [mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
> To: Keller, Jacob
> Cc: ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Rmergicide Through Programming
>
> HI Jacob
>
> Unbiased estimate of the true unmerged I/si
crystallographers?
Or…it really doesn’t matter that much?
JPK
From: Eleanor Dodson [mailto:eleanor.dod...@york.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 5:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob
Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Rmergicide Through Programming
Agree although i usually look to CC1/2. Rmeas makes
I find the lack of reporting statistics of the low resolution bins unfortunate!
Most statistics in Table 1 report the average across all resolutions or just
the high resolution reflection shell.
With respect to Rmerge, the agreement between the most intense (low resolution)
symmetry related
n...@diamond.ac.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
> To: Keller, Jacob
> Cc: ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Rmergicide Through Programming
>
> HI Jacob
>
> Unbiased estimate of the true unmerged I/sig(I) of your data (I find this
> particularly usefu
y and a hundred other things, so come
on, developers, just comment it out!
JPK
-Original Message-
From: graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk [mailto:graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Keller, Jacob
Cc: ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Rme
HI Jacob
Unbiased estimate of the true unmerged I/sig(I) of your data (I find this
particularly useful at low resolution) i.e. if your inner shell Rmerge is 10%
your data agree very poorly; if 2% says your data agree very well provided you
have sensible multiplicity… obviously depends on sensib
>Rmerge does contain information which complements the others.
What information? I was trying to think of a counterargument to what I
proposed, but could not think of a reason in the world to keep reporting it.
JPK
On 4 Jul 2017, at 12:00, Keller, Jacob
mailto:kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>> wrot
Jacob
Rmerge does contain information which complements the others. I'd prefer it
remains but agree it needs to be properly understood alongside the others you
mention
Cheers Graeme
On 4 Jul 2017, at 12:00, Keller, Jacob
mailto:kell...@janelia.hhmi.org>> wrote:
Dear Crystallographers,
Havin
24 matches
Mail list logo