I find the lack of reporting statistics of the low resolution bins unfortunate!
Most statistics in Table 1 report the average across all resolutions or just the high resolution reflection shell. With respect to Rmerge, the agreement between the most intense (low resolution) symmetry related reflections is very telling to the quality of the merged data in my opinion (radiation damage, absorption errors, very weakly exposed crystal, other strange systematic errors, etc). F On Jul 4, 2017, at 4:37 PM, Graeme Winter <graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk> wrote: > Unbiased estimate of the true unmerged I/sig(I) of your data (I find this > particularly useful at low resolution) i.e. if your inner shell Rmerge is 10% > your data agree very poorly; if 2% says your data agree very well provided > you have sensible multiplicity… obviously depends on sensible interpretation.
