;-)
Bert
From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Raji
Edayathumangalam [r...@brandeis.edu]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 3:24 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Potential Space Group Issue
Oops sorry for the slippery finger
__
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Raji
> Edayathumangalam [r...@brandeis.edu]
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 3:24 PM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Potential Space Group Issue
>
> Oops sorry for the slippery
K] On Behalf Of Raji
Edayathumangalam [r...@brandeis.edu]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 3:24 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Potential Space Group Issue
Oops sorry for the slippery fingers. I meant h00, 0k0 and 00l in my original
email and NOT "00h, 00k, 00l". Note
Oops sorry for the slippery fingers. I meant h00, 0k0 and 00l in my original
email and NOT "00h, 00k, 00l". Note the correction especially if you are a
first-year graduate student trying to learn stuff from these emails :)
Raji
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Raji Edayathumangalam wrote:
> He
Raji,
Assuming that the real space group is P212121, in P21 you will still get
a solution except for the extra NCS which will closely resemble the
extra 2-fold screw. Then you can probably tell if there are any
significant differences between NCS-related copies that justify lower
symmetry space g
Well you could have a monoclinic space group with beta = 90....0001, which
for everyone would mean 90.0 degrees. You could also have beta = exactly 90 by
pure chance. Normally the R-sym values should tell you which of the two
possibilities is the correct one.
If you obtain (an example) R-sy
