Re: [ccp4bb] refmac 5.5.063 vs. 5.5.066

2008-12-22 Thread Stein, ND (Norman)
: 19 December 2008 22:46 To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] refmac 5.5.063 vs. 5.5.066 The latest version with all the bugfixes will of course appear in CCP4-6.1.1. Until then, the latest binaries and source codes are available on the mentioned webpage. Pavol

Re: [ccp4bb] refmac 5.5.063 vs. 5.5.066

2008-12-19 Thread Pavol Skubak
The latest version with all the bugfixes will of course appear in CCP4-6.1.1. Until then, the latest binaries and source codes are available on the mentioned webpage. Pavol

Re: [ccp4bb] refmac 5.5.063 vs. 5.5.066

2008-12-19 Thread William G. Scott
Since version 5.5.0066 is the version in ccp4-6.1.0, is there going to be a patch? On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:32 PM, Jan Abendroth wrote: Thanks a lot, Pavol, that indeed did the trick. refmacRwork Rfree RMSDb RMSDan 5.5.0063 0.1682 0.2118 0.0204 1.717 5.5.0066 0.1781 0.2247 0

Re: [ccp4bb] refmac 5.5.063 vs. 5.5.066

2008-12-19 Thread Jan Abendroth
Thanks a lot, Pavol, that indeed did the trick. refmacRwork Rfree RMSDb RMSDan 5.5.0063 0.1682 0.2118 0.0204 1.717 5.5.0066 0.1781 0.2247 0.0205 1.764 5.5.0070 0.1663 0.2102 0.0204 1.719 Cheers Jan On Dec 19, 2008, at 2:21 AM, Pavol Skubak wrote: Hi Jan, the difference

Re: [ccp4bb] refmac 5.5.063 vs. 5.5.066

2008-12-19 Thread Pavol Skubak
Hi Jan, the difference between 5.5.0063 and 5.5.0066 is just a few bugfixes. However, unfortunately one of them introduced a new bug to 5.5.0066 which has been fixed in the later versions. Could you please upgrade to the latest version (currently 5.5.0070) from http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~garib/re

[ccp4bb] refmac 5.5.063 vs. 5.5.066

2008-12-17 Thread Jan Abendroth
Hi all, puzzled by an increase of R-factors when switching to the new ccp4 and along with it from refmac 5.5.0063 to 5.5.066, I took a closer look. Same refinement, same input (in fact, started from the interface with re-run job) gives distinctly different statistics. It appears to be only