I agree that looking at the packing is a good idea, but I also agree that
having the wrong space group is a likely possible explanation. That’s the most
common scenario when there are many clashing solutions with high TFZ scores.
Randy Read
On 17 Jun 2014, at 15:52, Roger Rowlett wrote:
> In
/2014 10:52 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] packing
test PHASER
Increase the number of allowed clashes in Phaser, re-run it then look at
the packing of the solution found and identify the source of the clashes.
Possibilities for the clash issue include:
Wrong
Increase the number of allowed clashes in Phaser, re-run it then look at
the packing of the solution found and identify the source of the
clashes. Possibilities for the clash issue include:
1. Wrong space group
2. Flexible loops or termini in search model not present or
differently arranged
Dear ccp4 users,
I get the following message from Phaser when I do a molecular replacement
with two ensembles. One of the ensembles is placed but the second one is
not placed, and then it says this:
Solutions with Z-scores greater than 13.0 (the threshold indicating a
definite
solution) were rej
