Sean Seaver wrote:
Better yet, RbBr? and pH MES, MOPS, and HEPES with RbOH?
I haven't checked the price.
Including shipping in the US
RbBr: 50 g 99% pure is ~$150.
RbOH: 25g 99+% pure in 50 % water runs about ~$120.
It would be interesting to see how the substitution would influence the
crys
>Better yet, RbBr? and pH MES, MOPS, and HEPES with RbOH?
>I haven't checked the price.
Including shipping in the US
RbBr: 50 g 99% pure is ~$150.
RbOH: 25g 99+% pure in 50 % water runs about ~$120.
It would be interesting to see how the substitution would influence the
crystallization or cryst
> >>> You might also want to try:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=12499536
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Stephen
> >>>
> >>> On 15 June 2011 02:09, Robbie Joosten wrote:
&g
n wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Wolfram,
>>>>
>>>> This was an early study on the subject:
>>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8594192
>>>> The software is still accessible via the STAN server.
>>>>
>>>
arly study on the subject:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8594192
The software is still accessible via the STAN server.
Cheers,
Robbie
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:51:21 -0400
From: wtem...@gmail.com
Subject: [ccp4bb] non-waters among structured solvent atoms
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Dear colleague
.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8594192
>> The software is still accessible via the STAN server.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Robbie
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:51:21 -0400
>>> From: wtem...@gmail.com
>>> Subject: [ccp4bb] non-waters among structured solvent a
le via the STAN server.
>
> Cheers,
> Robbie
>
>> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:51:21 -0400
>> From: wtem...@gmail.com
>> Subject: [ccp4bb] non-waters among structured solvent atoms
>> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>> following a disc
Hi Wolfram,
This was an early study on the subject:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8594192
The software is still accessible via the STAN server.
Cheers,
Robbie
> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:51:21 -0400
> From: wtem...@gmail.com
> Subject: [ccp4bb] non-waters among structure
cular_Crystallograp
hy_Fig_12-42.htm
BR
-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Jacob
Keller
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 4:27 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] non-waters among structured solvent atoms
How about halides? Anyo
How about halides? Anyone know of criteria for their binding sites?
JPK
ps Funny how my recent post was about almost exactly the same
thing--serendipity, I guess?
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Nat Echols wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:51 PM, wtempel wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>> foll
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:51 PM, wtempel wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> following a discussion in our lab, I have volunteered to dig out
> articles from the literature about erroneous assignments of non-water
> entities such as metal ions, halides in protein models. For example I
> have the faint re
Dear colleagues,
following a discussion in our lab, I have volunteered to dig out
articles from the literature about erroneous assignments of non-water
entities such as metal ions, halides in protein models. For example I
have the faint recollection that data mining of the PDB for suspect
"water" a
12 matches
Mail list logo
