t;
> http://www.douglas.co.uk/
>
> Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
>
> Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *
> rui
> *Sent:* 22 April 2009 17:06
1 36
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
rui
Sent: 22 April 2009 17:06
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] microbatch vs hanging drop
Hi,
I have a question about the method for crystallization. With traditional
hanging drop(24 wells), one slide ca
voice)
(716) 898-8660 (fax)
www.hwi.buffalo.edu <http://www.hwi.buffalo.edu>
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of
Kris Tesh
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:24 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] microbatch
.
Kris
-
Kris F. Tesh, Ph D
Director, Macromolecular Products
Rigaku Americas Corporation
9009 New Trails Drive
The Woodlands, TX 77381 USA
001 281 362 2300 x 144
From:
rui
To:
CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Date:
04/22/2009 11:09 AM
Subject:
[ccp4bb] microbatch vs hanging
Hi,
I have a question about the method for crystallization. With traditional
hanging drop(24 wells), one slide can also hold for multiple drops but it
requires the buffer quite a lot, > 600uL? Microbatch can save buffers,only
100uL is required, and also can hold up to three samples in the sitting
