chreu...@sanofi.com [mailto:herman.schreu...@sanofi.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 2:44 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob ; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: AW: [ccp4bb] include corners in mosflm
>
> With a detector in swing-out position, one has to include the corners. Also,
> why should
...@sanofi.com [mailto:herman.schreu...@sanofi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 2:44 AM
To: Keller, Jacob ; CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: AW: [ccp4bb] include corners in mosflm
With a detector in swing-out position, one has to include the corners. Also,
why should one discard potential data
] Im Auftrag von Keller,
Jacob
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. September 2017 22:14
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] include corners in mosflm
Why on earth would one want that to be the *default*? I understand that there
may be the odd unrepeatable dataset collected too close, or there may
[mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of CCP4BB
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:11 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] include corners in mosflm
Hi Ed
I'm afraid not; that's one thing that can't be changed to a different default.
Harry
--
Dr Harry Powell
Chair
Hi Ed
I'm afraid not; that's one thing that can't be changed to a different default.
Harry
--
Dr Harry Powell
Chairman of European Crystallographic Association SIG9 (Crystallographic
Computing)
> On 26 Sep 2017, at 20:34, Edwin Pozharski wrote:
>
> By default, iMosflm excludes corners from p
By default, iMosflm excludes corners from processing. Is there a simple
way to make it the default to go all the way to the corner instead of
detector edge? I could of course set the max resolution for processing to
some outrageous value that is guaranteed to be outside of the image, but
perhaps
