Dear Evette,
You can still get this analysis with Scala even after scaling with
scalepack. If you output the measurements unmerged (no merge original
index) you can convert them to MTZ using pointless, then remerge the
data as follows:
scala hkiin from_pointless.mtz hklout merged.mtz << eof
run 1
h the same resolution bins used in scaling.
The usage for parsing is "autoscale.pl -e scale.log"
See if this is of any use.
Best,
--Paul
--- On Mon, 11/1/10, Radisky, Evette S., Ph.D. wrote:
From: Radisky, Evette S., Ph.D.
Subject: [ccp4bb] finding from HKL Scalepack
To: CCP4BB@JISC
On 11/1/10 4:18 PM, Radisky, Evette S., Ph.D. wrote:
Two questions:
(1) Is this / what is generally reported in the literature
for data processed with the HKL suite?
Possibly. I say possibly because nobody appears to footnote their
"I/sigI" rows in their data processing tables, so it's impo
ctruncate outputs the table with Mn(F/sd) (which will be twice Mn(I/sd))
when it does anisotropy analysis
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 15:18 -0500, Radisky, Evette S., Ph.D. wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have previously used SCALA for data reduction, and in publications
> and pdb depositions, reported the
Dear all,
I have previously used SCALA for data reduction, and in publications and
pdb depositions, reported the "Mn(I/sd)" output from SCALA for the whole
data set and for the highest resolution shell.
We now have some data that has instead been reduced using the HKL suite,
and I am confused ab
