On 11/1/10 4:18 PM, Radisky, Evette S., Ph.D. wrote:
Two questions: (1) Is this <I>/<Sigma(I)> what is generally reported in the literature for data processed with the HKL suite?
Possibly. I say possibly because nobody appears to footnote their "I/sigI" rows in their data processing tables, so it's impossible to tell which statistic they are reporting. The editorial/proof-reading staff at journals aren't catching this ambiguity.
I personally report <I/sig(I)> but wrote my own program to do it from the .sca files.
Phil Jeffrey Princeton
