Re: [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications

2017-12-18 Thread raj kumar
gt; Usually, fo-fc is the best way to show. > > > best, > > > -- > chenzhonghao...@163.com > > > *From:* raj kumar > *Date:* 2017-12-19 13:07 > *To:* CCP4BB > *Subject:* [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications > Hi > W

Re: [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications

2017-12-18 Thread Bernhard Rupp
2-19 13:07 *To:* CCP4BB *Subject:* [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications Hi Which electron density map (fo-fc or 2fo-fc) should I use for representing the density of the bound ligand? Thanks Raj

Re: [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications

2017-12-18 Thread chenzhonghao...@163.com
Dear Raj, Usually, fo-fc is the best way to show. best, chenzhonghao...@163.com From: raj kumar Date: 2017-12-19 13:07 To: CCP4BB Subject: [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications Hi Which electron density map (fo-fc or 2fo-fc) should I use for representing the density of the

Re: [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications

2017-12-18 Thread Bernhard Rupp
http://journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2013/02/00/index.html Best, BR From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of raj kumar Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 8:37 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications Hi Which electron

[ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications

2017-12-18 Thread raj kumar
Hi Which electron density map (fo-fc or 2fo-fc) should I use for representing the density of the bound ligand? Thanks Raj

Re: [ccp4bb] electron density map

2009-08-21 Thread Ed Pozharski
Tassos is absolutely right. While it's unlikely that many subscribers of the ccp4bb today suffer the indecency of checking their mailbox over 4kbps flaky modem connection (also known as wishful staring at the progress bar), it still seems pointless to distribute hundreds of megabytes into mailboxe

Re: [ccp4bb] electron density map

2009-08-21 Thread Anastassis Perrakis
hi - my two cents: 1. I am puzzled to see only positive and no negative density in the picture 2. I would contour difference maps at 3.5 in general for significant features 3. why is the 2fofc 'heavily biased' ? Its a 2mFo-DFc map presumably, and lots have been said about these maps not bei

Re: [ccp4bb] electron density map

2009-08-20 Thread James Stroud
I agree with Artem. I also don't think you have a register problem. All of the residues show typical 2fofc density for their types, especially considering the 3A data. The disappearing act of the asp carboxyl is typical of solvent exposed aspartates. Assuming the register is correct, you ha

Re: [ccp4bb] electron density map

2009-08-20 Thread Artem Evdokimov
uild as if the sand were stone" Jorge Luis Borges _ From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Mike England Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:24 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: [ccp4bb] electron density map Hi all, I will appreciate the comments